Another possibility would be that I rename the foomatic-db-xml package
back to foomatic-db but let it provide foomatic-db-xml so that through
this virtual package name one can safely request the PPD files. WDYT?
Till
On 07/30/2011 06:08 PM, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Sorry, I did not know that
Sorry, I will rename it back and use the Build-Conflicts method.
Till
On 07/30/2011 07:30 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:08:42PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Sorry, I did not know that a package rename is such complicated in
Debian, in Ubuntu it is processed very quickly
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:08:42PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Sorry, I did not know that a package rename is such complicated in
> Debian, in Ubuntu it is processed very quickly.
Renaming a package in Ubuntu without doing so in Debian first and/or
even contacting the maintainer is extremely co
Sorry, I did not know that a package rename is such complicated in
Debian, in Ubuntu it is processed very quickly. Also I did not know that
there is a Build-Conflicts concept. This is a great thing for such a
situation.
In the last days I looked for you on IRC (#ubuntu-devel) and did not
find
Hi Till,
I noticed your 20110722-0ubuntu2 [0] upload on Ubuntu and I must say that I am
far from happy with this change mostly because it happenned without any
previous discussion (although I was available on IRC and email the whole
week).
Any binary package rename in Debian takes time (NEW p