Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [DUS expenses]
Ok. I certainly wouldn't call items for sale a case of spending on
itself, though; and at least in the US, I suspect these expenses might
be accounted for in a somewhat different fashion than the breakdown
given above. (But perhaps
MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
In many
circumstances, law says groups must apply for a decision,
but DUS won't and I'm not sure whether the call reported in
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pipermail/debian-uk/2005-August/010548.html
really happened or was a joke like much of the rest of that mail.
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you think that mail was a joke? [...]
The poor attempt at telepathy, claiming someone said BTW and :-)
then rounding off by confirming that a constitution is required if
you ask for a bank account type that requires a constitution
(and exclude other
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:52:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:39:19 +0100 Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am happy to work on how to do this with moin moin but I need to
know that others agree this is necessary.
...and I'd be happy to work with upstream
4 matches
Mail list logo
