Hello, my name is Michael Chagnon. I am in an independent music group
called "Escape Velocity". Our web site is located at:
www.escapevelocity.com. I was interested in having one song of ours,
from our new album, distributed with the Debian package. So that when
users install Debian, they have a pi
Steve Langasek writes...
> That's a fine goal, but I believe it's out of scope for the LSB, and I don't
> want to see the ability of distros to conform to the LSB compromised by some
> poorly designed attempt to enforce common init script names.
As I pointed out in another mail, the LSB can't ma
Petter Reinholdtsen writes...
>
> [Steve Langasek]
> > Debian packages shouldn't have to compete with the LSB for its own
> > namespace.
As pointed out in another mail, they don't. Trying to quash this wrong idea
before it spreads...
> Well, assuming that it is a good thing to have cross-dist
Steve Langasek writes...
> Right, so if this is "generally understood", why does the text of the LSB
> standard read the exact opposite, telling implementors that they should
> register all of their init script names with LANANA?
Where does it say that? I just scanned that chapter and I can't fi
ma, 2005-10-03 kello 13:55 +0100, Philip Hands kirjoitti:
> I think both latitudes can be largely satisfied if LANANA can be persuaded
> (if they do not already do so) to solicit approval from distributors before
> issuing new approvals.
It's so much easier to do this:
1) LANANA only appr
Ciao...
Sono un ragazzo di 23 anni che da poco sta iniziando a intraprendere lo studio
di Linux.
Sto iniziando la raccolta di "Facilissimo Linux" e iniziando a leggere e
sfogliando qualche pagina internet sono capitato sul vostro sito!
Sinceramente mi ha colpito tantissimo, e forse รจ la spinta gi
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
>
>>The goal of the LSB is to provide a standard that ISVs can write to
>>-- *not* to make life easier for admins moving from distro to
>>distro.
>
>
> Hm, that is sad. Because some of us with a large number of machines,
> do need to handle cross-di
* Branden Robinson:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> I hereby tender my resignation as Debian Release Manager.
>
> Thanks for your outstanding service, Colin. Reinventing the team
> mid-release was not easy, but you and Steve didn't flinch from it and did a
> gre
[Steve Langasek]
> The goal of the LSB is to provide a standard that ISVs can write to
> -- *not* to make life easier for admins moving from distro to
> distro.
Hm, that is sad. Because some of us with a large number of machines,
do need to handle cross-distribution consistency. Not to move fro
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:40:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
> > Debian packages shouldn't have to compete with the LSB for its own
> > namespace.
> Well, assuming that it is a good thing to have cross-distribution
> consistency, because this make users more comfortable
[Steve Langasek]
> Debian packages shouldn't have to compete with the LSB for its own
> namespace.
Well, assuming that it is a good thing to have cross-distribution
consistency, because this make users more comfortable with moving to
Linux from their current platform, I believe it would be a good
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:31:05AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > Did you happen to see the comments about getting a sane option for init
> > script handling into the LSB, so that we don't get stuck having to argue
> > with LANANA at some later date?:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005
12 matches
Mail list logo
