-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:14:06AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
After that, we can have a discussion about:
- Should people be encouraged to commit the changes they make in an NMU
to the package's Vcs?
- Should people be encouraged to commit any
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:20:46AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
How about just sneak in a recommendation to check debian/README.Source
for any hints about specific packaging routines to be aware of?
Nice idea, as it would address any other potential hints from
maintainers to NMUers, possibly
On 12/08/08 at 08:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:14:06AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
After that, we can have a discussion about:
- Should people be encouraged to commit the changes they make in an NMU
to the package's Vcs?
- Should people be encouraged to
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm interested both in ACKs and suggestions for changes.
I second the proposal (I like better if you include the
Jonas proposal about README.source).
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:09:09AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 12/08/08 at 08:20 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:14:06AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
After that, we can have a discussion about:
- Should people be
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:53 -0300]:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting again
now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm opening a subthread
to see if I'm alone on this, or
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:53 -0300]:
Hi, these are some other, mostly minor bits:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
where X is a counter starting at 1. If the last upload was also
an NMU, the counter should be increased. For example, if
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:37:17PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting again
now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm opening a subthread
to see if I'm alone
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting
again now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm opening a
subthread to see if I'm alone on this, or what.
In case anyone's interested in the context, the thread dato's
referring
On 12/08/08 at 12:25 -0300, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:09:09AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
However, I don't think that it's the main purpose of
debian/README.source (which is to document how to get the source of the
package ready for editing). Whether to
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:18:40 -0300]:
In addition, it has the advantage of being clearer,
And the disadvantage of being less compact. Who do we /need/ to make it
clearer for? Who that wouldn't be familiar with the old syntax could
/benefit/ from this explicitness?
(In the old
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:53 -0300]:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
I already objected to this in the past, and I'm loudly objecting again
now. Some people on IRC shared this objection; I'm
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:33:47PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
And the disadvantage of being less compact.
len('1.2.3-1+nmu1') - len('1.2.3-1.1') = 3
len('1:1.0.rc2svn20080706-0.1') - len('1.2.3-1') = 17
are we really discussing the disadvantages of *3* extra characters when
we have version
On 12/08/08 at 20:44 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:28:53 -0300]:
Hi, these are some other, mostly minor bits:
The version must be the version of the last upload, plus +nmuX,
where X is a counter starting at 1. If the last upload was also
an
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:16:56PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The whole developers-reference is written in a non-gender-neutral
manner. If there's consensus that it's a good idea, I would prefer if
the whole devref was converted at once, instead of converting only this
part.
Any
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:16:56PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The whole developers-reference is written in a non-gender-neutral
manner. If there's consensus that it's a good idea, I would prefer
if the whole devref was converted at once,
16 matches
Mail list logo
