On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:45:47PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> argued that everyone can and should work together. I just mentioned
> that if the pool of people willing to do annoyingly tedious work in
> exchange for being insulted regularly on mailing lists was that large,
> we should have seen m
You're invited to "work and live in canada".
By your host First NameKatherine Pritcard:
Date: Tuesday October 28, 2008
Time: 1:00 am - 2:00 am (GMT +00:00)
Will you attend? RSVP to this invitation at:
http://calendar.yahoo.com/brunswick_halifaxinfo?v
"BF" == Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BF> For this, though, the relevant field is not copyright; it's
BF> trademark.
BF> Debian does, IIRC, have a trademark monopoly on the Debian
BF> logos; but I can't find reference to that, so I may be
BF> wrong. I'll continue on the ass
On Mon Oct 27 20:28, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Her basic idea is, that in addictive games the first levels of success are
> easy to achieve and then it gets harder, but only so slowly so that people
> dont loose motivation. She also manages very well to carry this over to free
> software developmen
> Please get it from here:
> http://www.greffrath.com/debian/archive/debian-0.91beta.tar.gz
Now, while I was moving sarge to archive.d.o I wanted to get this there
too. Unfortunately I can't. Its binary only.
Does *anyone* have sources for such old Debian releases?
--
bye, Joerg
I'm James Tro
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 04:24:24PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> The Debian Contributor class is a class of people that the Debian
>> project doesn't give any tool/resource to do their work.
>
> Which is untrue:
>
> - you can dig in this thread and you will find mem
Hi,
On Monday 27 October 2008 17:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > If someone is only trustable to package perl modules, shouldn't he be a
> > DM instead of a DD?
> We might want him to be able to package new perl modules on his own? Where
> do you draw the line? If you maintain 20 or 50 perl modules
On 27/10/08 at 17:20 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it
> > > > > would
> >
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it
> > > > would
> > > > require the intervention of many DD each time we have
On 27/10/08 at 16:40 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it would
> > > require the intervention of many DD each time we have to grant a right
> > > (when trusting the decision of 2 m
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - this process might be too heavy with fine-grained privileges as it would
> > require the intervention of many DD each time we have to grant a right
> > (when trusting the decision of 2 members with special rights would be
> > enough).
>
> That
On 27/10/08 at 16:01 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Power-hungry might well be interested by this role but when 20 other
> people have the same power, you really don't gain much with your power.
> Unfairness is difficult to avoid as all human judgment have a subjective
> part… but I don't see why
Hi,
thanks for your comment. For reference, people might not have noticed but
my initial mail was not only a reply to liw's mail but a real alternative
proposal. BTW, I added some further explanations on my blog:
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2008/10/27/debian-membership-reform/
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Lu
Hi,
On 24/10/08 at 21:59 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As such I really don't buy that all DD should be equal when it comes to
> technical work however I do think we have to move in the direction where
> we broaden our membership to new kind of contributors and that all
> contributors should hav
On Sunday 2008-10-26, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Well, different weight. To be able to clearly seperate (using the terms
> of my much-discussed text) "is a DC/DM" and "is a DME/DD". Basically
> the look to the outside (press, users, etc), if a DC/DM writes something
> it is less binding to the project
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:07:16AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> The idea for contributor.d.o includes either to reserve all existing
> debian.org UIDs within the @contributor.d.o namespace or activate
> them as forwarding or giving people the choice to activate or
> whatever.
What about the other
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 04:24:24PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> The Debian Contributor class is a class of people that the Debian
> project doesn't give any tool/resource to do their work.
Which is untrue:
- you can dig in this thread and you will find members of DSA stating
that DC can be gi
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:56:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Secondly, What exactly to these members of the project do, if
> they do not vote or upload packages?
They might commit to the webml repository or sent mails to debian-news,
e.g.
Of course, they could just vote as well,
18 matches
Mail list logo
