Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:04:43PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:26:22AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: NB! These comments are based on the latest published rev. 135 draft. If fixed in later drafts, I apologize

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ke, 2010-12-22 at 15:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The canonical URL http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ has been updated too - but by hand, with a warning at the top that it might go stale. Actually, I was quite happy with the way things were. The draft of DEP5 in svn was and is the

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ke, 2010-12-22 at 02:23 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:54:56PM +, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : On ti, 2010-12-21 at 14:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I don't have an opinion on whether MIT license is ambiguous or not, but notice that it is still (in Bazaar

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:02:24PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On ke, 2010-12-22 at 15:29 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The canonical URL http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ has been updated too - but by hand, with a warning at the top that it might go stale. Actually, I was quite happy with

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ke, 2010-12-22 at 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I respect your great work here, Lars, but disagree with your style. If you disagree with my reasons for doing edits in bzr and not pushing changes to svn all the time, you can argue those. You even have an excellent chance of convincing

DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:17:10PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On ke, 2010-12-22 at 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I respect your great work here, Lars, but disagree with your style. If you disagree with my reasons for doing edits in bzr and not pushing changes to svn all the time,

Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:46:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : In my opinion, DEP5 is a work in progress, and as such discouraged for general consumption. This is indicated my its status as DRAFT. Dear Jonas, I concur. To my knowledge, it was never announced that the version in the

Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

2010-12-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Charles, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:11:04AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:46:19PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : In my opinion, DEP5 is a work in progress, and as such discouraged for general consumption. This is indicated my its status as DRAFT. I concur.