On Du, 19 feb 12, 19:56:11, Uoti Urpala wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli leader at debian.org writes:
- Debian should neither seek nor accept trademark licenses that are
specific to the Debian Project.
(Suggested by Steve Langasek. In addition to Steve's reasoning, I
think that doing
Jose Luis Rivas ghost...@debian.org
On 02/17/2012 06:11 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/legal/fsf-osi-list-diff.txt
shows the ones where OSI and FSF disagree, but what's the
point of knowing which are involved? Basically, OSI has
aided proliferation.
The point of my
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org
Going through the above, I suspect that the first provision (extending
DFSG §4) might be controversial. But the more I think of it, the more
convinced I am that it'd be in the spirit of the current wording of DFSG
§4, as hinted by the title of DFSG §4. In
Craig Small csmall at debian.org writes:
tentacles of evil problem. Trademark isn't all about trust, it's
also about control. We, unfortunately, cannot ignore it but we have
to deal with it our way.
All of the sections in the DFSG are important. We could of, when
framing the DFSG, gone the
Andrei POPESCU andreimpopescu at gmail.com writes:
On Du, 19 feb 12, 19:56:11, Uoti Urpala wrote:
Thus, I think it would
make sense to have arrangements allowing Debian specifically to modify the
software in ways deemed necessary by the project without asking permission
for each
Le Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:26:59PM +, Uoti Urpala a écrit :
If you want to allow doing all modifications permitted by the DFSG
(which includes obnoxious ones) without the effort of rebranding, then
you must remove all use of trademarks from Debian, including the
Debian trademark itself.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:26:59PM +, Uoti Urpala wrote:
You can't trust entities like Debian to stay good forever. The only
practical way to maintain trust is to maintain some degree of control.
You can't enumerate all the possible kinds of badness you'd want to
forbid, and then grant a
Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi writes:
Stefano Zacchiroli leader at debian.org writes:
- Debian should neither seek nor accept trademark licenses that are
specific to the Debian Project.
(Suggested by Steve Langasek. In addition to Steve's reasoning, I
think that doing
Hello dear,
I'm selling links on some high PR sites (PR9 / PR8 / PR7). If you want to
buy such links, then do let me know.
Regards.
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 01:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:26:59PM +, Uoti Urpala a écrit :
If you want to allow doing all modifications permitted by the DFSG
(which includes obnoxious ones) without the effort of rebranding, then
you must remove all use of
Hi all,
I think that we can't make requirements or recommendations on others trademarks
without applying them to ourselves.
Have we used our trademarks in the past, and how are we expecting to use them
in the future ?
Then, how does this use complies with our social contract ?
Compared to
11 matches
Mail list logo
