Hi,
This bug report was unclear and very confusing for me at first ... But
I think he is the one confused or misguided, now. I am CCing project
and zak since they seems to be the source of his argument.
If the bug reporter wishes to kill everything about non-free from Debian
related documents
Hi!
Am 03.09.2012 15:14, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
If the bug reporter wishes to kill everything about non-free from Debian
related documents and archive area, I can tell him to go to the source
:-) Debian policy (Sure this is in our main area which is the real
Debian system)
2.2.3 The
On Thursday 30 August 2012 01:25:28 Charles Plessy wrote:
I am therefore considering to submit to the IANA a new media type, for
instance text/vnd.debian.copyright, for the machine-readable copyright
files following the format at
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:46:12PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
Am 03.09.2012 15:14, schrieb Osamu Aoki:
If the bug reporter wishes to kill everything about non-free from Debian
related documents and archive area, I can tell him to go to the source
:-) Debian policy
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 22:14:44, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I am reporting this bug because Stefano Zacchiroli has called for a
free-ness assessment [2]. It is up to the package maintainer on how to
proceed.
So you are making me feel I am doing something DPL does not approve...
But I can not find
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Osamu Aoki wrote:
For example, if package build environment has pre-defined and agreed
environment variable such as:
DERIVATIVE=(undefined) # debian build
DERIVATIVE=debian # debian build
DERIVATIVE=ubuntu # ubuntu build
DERIVATIVE=trisquel# trisquel
Le Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
On Thursday 30 August 2012 01:25:28 Charles Plessy wrote:
I am therefore considering to submit to the IANA a new media type, for
instance text/vnd.debian.copyright, for the machine-readable copyright
files following the
7 matches
Mail list logo
