Thanks to all participants on this thread thus far.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:52:18 +0200, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
or other official documentes should carry the official logo, so
their reproduction and modification is not legal.
I
I was hoping someone else would chime in (I hate dominating discussions
on MLs, so someone, please cut me off)
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:21:07PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Thanks to all participants on this thread thus far.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
How about the attached patch?
Looks great to me. Calling it restricted is technically correct, and
well, that's the the best kind of correct.
I second this (I am on the camp of we need/should keep the restricted
logo). I consider this an
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:28:18PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
How about the attached patch?
Looks great to me. Calling it restricted is technically correct, and
well, that's the the best kind of correct.
I second this (I am
4 matches
Mail list logo
