Hi MJ, thanks for your feedback!
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:32:20PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Hold on :-) All you're discussing here already exists. FTP masters vet
software that enters the archive, de facto deciding whether the
associated licenses
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:16:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I found a report of Richard Fontana's talk here:
http://lwn.net/Articles/516896/
Oh, thanks, I forgot about that one.
[…] we are not doing a good job at documenting and explaining our
choices […]
This is unfortunate. But
I volunteered to Stefano to try to summarise and synthesise the
discussion about our inbound trademark licence policy. Here is the
previous discussion head article:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/02/msg00073.html
In this message I'm going mostly to write things from the point of
A little while ago I wrote this:
There are often topics about where it would be useful to have a
statement of position, or some recommendations for project
participants (or for users or citizens). I'm speaking here primarily
of nontechnical matters.
Often these are in the remit of
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:55:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
One thing first: The question if we change DFSG and documenting what we
think is free (or not) are two entirely different things, and shouldn't
be mixed together.
I'm replying only to the documenting thing using my ftpmaster hat,
Joerg Jaspert writes (Re: Validity of DFSG #10):
But we would be happy to work with / lead / whatever-one-names it with a
group of volunteers together. Exact details of how that works out are to
be found, but im sure we can. If there are volunteers for it...
I would volunteer. But:
We have
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:26:18PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Joerg Jaspert writes (Re: Validity of DFSG #10):
But we would be happy to work with / lead / whatever-one-names it with a
group of volunteers together. Exact details of how that works out are to
be found, but im sure we can. If
Stefano Zacchiroli writes (Re: Validity of DFSG #10):
I interpreted it in the sense that they are looking for volunteers to
*document* past, present, and future decisions made by ftp-masters. You
interpreted it in the sense that they are looking for volunteers to
participate in the decision
On 13085 March 1977, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The whole of ftp* agrees that it would be nice to have a place
documenting this. So much so that we started something for it in 2009,
see http://ftp-master.debian.org/licenses/ for it.
Oo, that's awesome! I had no idea something like that
9 matches
Mail list logo
