Full disclosure:
Transfer #1
transfer: [
{
type: Transfer,
source: https://meritora.com/i/d***Digital Bazaar Executive Name
Redacted***/accounts/primary,
destination: https://meritora.com/i/netflux/accounts/primary;,
amount: 0.009800,
I know it's too late because everyone has already read my accidental posting of
a first draft that was still undergoing heavy editing but I wanted to set the
record straight about what I actually intended to publish a couple minutes ago
with the correct version. If you've already read the last
Brian, what do you think of the successes of participatory budgeting in Porto
Alegre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_budgeting?
Also doesn't that dailymail article state that it's mostly the upper classes
that are tempted by the mere smell of money?
One 2012 study by the
On Tue, June 18, 2013 04:31, Martin Owens wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:03 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
site requesting user's charity
You mean user's involvement. You don't want users to be invited to
participate in Debian. Debian isn't elitist and it shouldn't care that
the tool being
]] Manu Sporny
On 06/16/2013 06:26 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
OTOH, I think it would be fine to have something at the package level
to pass on donations to our upstreams, as well as to ease donating to
the Debian project as a whole. See [1,2], already mentioned by Paul
Wise in his
Hi,
I didnt want to participate in this thread anymore (all has been said) but then
I found this new study linked below by chance and found it matching this thread
too well...
On Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
What do you think of this recent University Study?
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
If that's what an upstream is after, they should pick a different
software license;
Non-Commercial terms are non-free. If they want to exclude commercial
distribution they should not be involved in Free Software.
Free as in Freedom, the
On 18-06-13 05:50, Martin Owens wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
They are not the same thing at all. The social effects
are almost completely different.
It's not a false equivalence. Participation is not just about being a
programmer, if you can convince a
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 14:25 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
and I'd be willing to accept that we may need to improve
Yes.
FYI Not my new toy. I'm not affiliated with and have no relation to
payswarm. The technical mechanism isn't as important as the social ones.
M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:00 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
If that's what an upstream is after, they should pick a different
software license;
Non-Commercial terms are non-free. If they want to exclude commercial
distribution they should not be involved
Hi,
So everyone knows that the declassification of -private isn't going to happen
any time soon. Why not do the opposite? there is probably more interest in
that and would be easier to implement.
At present, new DDs can access emails that were sent to -private years ago.
People who might (or
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:49:55PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
At present, new DDs can access emails that were sent to -private years ago.
I've read such emails, just to get an idea of what's been sent, to
figure out what the heck private is for, really (when I was a green DD).
I mean, I
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
So, to get mail from 2 years ago, you have to decompress every tarball
between now and then?
s/decompress/decrypt/ yes, that's the idea. Possibly having the secrets
shared between different people every time.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
Hello.
I use debian-live-7.0.0-amd64-gnome-desktop.
And it has error in Time Zones Settings.
System Time changes during installation.
It`s possible that date can changes too.
for example:
when i boot from livecd i change location settings from London to Russia
(Asia), Krasnoyarsk
and my
[I don't read d-projet]
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Comments?
The spirit of the GR was to open more (even before OpenData became
trendy, cf. today's G8's declaration). I fear that your proposal will
ease the opposite.
--
Adnène
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Mohammed Adnène Trojette dijo [Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:02:39AM +0200]:
[I don't read d-projet]
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Comments?
The spirit of the GR was to open more (even before OpenData became
trendy, cf. today's G8's declaration). I fear that your proposal will
Le Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:49:55PM +0200, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
At present, new DDs can access emails that were sent to -private years ago.
People who might (or might not) be a member of the project and sent an email
may not necessarily agree to that. Or a less controversial example:
Hello all,
I have a serious problem which is concerned with a Debian
package. It is also a problem for Debian, I believe.
If this mail is out of place, I will apologize. Although I
looked at all mailing lists of Debian, I could not find
any other list than here for this issue. Would you please
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Some of us (myself definitely included) are involved in free software
precisely *because* we're strongly anti-capitalist, anti-marketing, and
firmly opposed to the economic structures that dominate so much of the
rest of life. If your plea is for
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Some of us (myself definitely included) are involved in free software
precisely *because* we're strongly anti-capitalist, anti-marketing, and
firmly opposed to the economic structures that dominate so much of the
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 07:58 +0900, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote:
Hello all,
I have a serious problem which is concerned with a Debian
package. It is also a problem for Debian, I believe.
If this mail is out of place, I will apologize. Although I
looked at all mailing lists of Debian, I could not
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:15:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The only way to override a maintainer's decision is through the
Technical Committee http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.
In addition to this great advice, I'd also like to add what's inferred
by this remark - ron is actively
This is a highly re-worked proposal for performing upstream donations
and donations to the Debian project. Major changes include:
* Debian developers are not allowed to receive any direct monetary
contribution or change the upstream DONATE file in any way.
* The solution isn't specific to apt.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
* Debian developers are not allowed to receive any direct monetary
contribution or change the upstream DONATE file in any way.
There are definitely situations where not updating the DONATE file is
a bad idea; when upstream is dead and the
So let's get this straight.
Step 1) Ask APT people if it belongs in APT
Get told to go to debian-project list
Step 2) Ask debian-project list if can put in APT
Get told doesn't belong in APT
Step 3) Fix proposal so it's not in APT, goes upstream as asked for, etc.
Get told to go tell another
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
Does this sound like a workable solution?
I think you should take this to the FreeDesktop lists, Debian is just
one distro and we certainly can't set cross-distro upstream standards.
I would also encourage
hello shigio.
where can i find more discussion of the following concern, raised in
the #574947 bugthread?
r...@debian.org wrote, on 2013-03-06
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574947#59):
I cannot feel comfortable about introducing a new interface for
end-users that
Venture Communism venturecommun...@yahoo.com writes:
So let's get this straight.
Step 1) Ask APT people if it belongs in APT
Get told to go to debian-project list
Step 2) Ask debian-project list if can put in APT
Get told doesn't belong in APT
Step 3) Fix proposal so it's not in APT,
Le Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:55:11PM -0400, Manu Sporny a écrit :
This is a highly re-worked proposal for performing upstream donations
and donations to the Debian project. Major changes include:
* Debian developers are not allowed to receive any direct monetary
contribution or change the
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Mohammed Adnène Trojette adn+...@diwi.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Comments?
The spirit of the GR was to open more (even before OpenData became
trendy, cf. today's G8's declaration). I fear that your proposal will
ease the opposite.
If the
Hello wes,
Thank you for getting interested.
I don't know what is pointed out by the statement:
'I expressed my concerns about this to you already.'
It is his two commands: 'htmake' and 'htconfig' which I dismissed.
If there is a serious defect, I would like to know it too.
Taisuke's
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Shigio YAMAGUCHI shi...@gnu.org wrote:
I have a serious problem which is concerned with a Debian
package. It is also a problem for Debian, I believe.
Any particular reason you didn't CC Ron on this thread? Usually when
talking about someone we do that.
--
32 matches
Mail list logo
