On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So I don't think bans need to be posted anywhere prominent like
debian-devel-announce, but I do think basic facts like who is banned, for
how long, and the rationale (with links to specific mailing list posts as
reference) should be
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
What do the rest of you think?
Given how arbitrarly other bans have been proposed, I think that the outcome
should stay private unless the banned person wishes so. This will
Hi!
In general I agree, but one reason can fire back:
* Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org [2013-10-26 19:46:41 CEST]:
- It provides a reference point for newcomers to the Debian community to
judge their actions by, to understand what kinds of things will get them
banned from
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
What do the rest of you think?
Given how arbitrarly other bans have been proposed, I think that the
outcome should stay private unless the banned person
Am Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2013, 07:58:03 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:46:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
What do the rest of you think?
Given how arbitrarly other bans have been proposed, I think
Am Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2013, 08:54:30 schrieb Enrico Zini:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Simply obfuscating the name on the list of banned users (or not posting
any names at all, only links to the posts that led to the ban) would
I'm in favour of not posting
Hi,
What do the rest of you think?
+1 for publishing the facts of bans and their reasons in a public mailing list.
Only with one correction which have been well described by Rhonda:
- It provides a reference point for newcomers to the Debian community to
judge their actions by, to
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
What do the rest of you think?
+1 for publishing the facts of bans and their reasons in a public mailing
list.
Only with one correction which have been well described by Rhonda:
- It provides a reference point for newcomers to the Debian
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
I suggest we keep things civil, with respect for the persons involved. It's
really not up to Debian to harm someone's reputation, and that could reflect
bad on Debian's reputation.
Approaches I could support
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
This also seems like a good compromise to me. Do the other folks who
object to publishing information that could damage the poster's
reputation (e.g., Bart, Ingo) think this is ok?
The problem that I have with publicly posting mailing list bans is
* Joey Hess:
Simply obfuscating the name on the list of banned users (or not posting
any names at all, only links to the posts that led to the ban) would
eliminate most reputational damage. Ie, random searches for that
person would not turn up a high pagerank debian.org page listing their
Hi.
Perhaps one should think whether such publishing might have legal
consequences...
In some countries (like the US) it seems not be so uncommon to publicly
name offenders or criminals on webpages... in Europe though, you might
get into legal troubles.
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description:
Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net writes:
Perhaps one should think whether such publishing might have legal
consequences...
In some countries (like the US) it seems not be so uncommon to publicly
name offenders or criminals on webpages... in Europe though, you might
get into
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Charles Plessy wrote:
In parallel, I think that we need some technical or social pressure for
limiting to 1 or 2 messages a day each individual contribution to long
threads.
Le Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:35:56AM +0100, Alexander Wirt a écrit :
That is nonsense. There
Le Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:54:02AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I have just uploaded the Debian Policy 3.9.5.0.
Dear all,
this upload represent one year of work, and it was a very interesting
experience, where I leaned a lot about the Debian packaging system.
Unfortunately, my enthusiasm
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:33:42PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Joey Hess:
Simply obfuscating the name on the list of banned users (or not posting
any names at all, only links to the posts that led to the ban) would
eliminate most reputational damage. Ie, random searches for that
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:46:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:27:25PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
I suggest we keep things civil, with respect for the persons involved.
It's
really not up to Debian to harm someone's reputation, and that
17 matches
Mail list logo
