On 27/02/14 at 11:11 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:35:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 22/02/14 at 20:57 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
Has there been any analysis of how active the developers are? I'd
hazard to guess that a good number
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Not really, the listing is about keys, not uploads (only listing the
last upload for a given key). The correct interpretation is:
| Well, a quick grep on the result shows that of those 652 1024b keys,
| only half of them were used
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:59:23PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
It doesn't really change anything, does it? Sure, uploads are not the
only way to check someone is active, but still, people with no upload
since 2012 and a 1024{D,R} key is likely a candidate for direct contact.
It would
Hi all,
Over the past few weeks, we've seen a number of issues with certain
people connecting over TOR, and repeatedly sending various inappropriate
comments to a number of IRC channels in the #debian* namespace,
including #debian-ctte and #debian-women.
Unfortunately, from a OFTC network point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call
for seconds. I don't think further lengthy discussion of the issues is
likely to be productive, and therefore hope we can bring this swiftly
to a vote so that the project can
5 matches
Mail list logo
