On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:44:41PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:19:44PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Somewhere in another universe, someone noticed that many developers
> > have assigned country code “UK” in LDAP:
> >
> > $ ldapsearch -x c=uk | grep -c ^uid:
> > 114
>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:19:44PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Somewhere in another universe, someone noticed that many developers
> have assigned country code “UK” in LDAP:
>
> $ ldapsearch -x c=uk | grep -c ^uid:
> 114
>
> But, RFC 4519, §2.2 reads: “The 'c' ('countryName' in X.500)
> attribute
Somewhere in another universe, someone noticed that many developers have
assigned country code “UK” in LDAP:
$ ldapsearch -x c=uk | grep -c ^uid:
114
But, RFC 4519, §2.2 reads: “The 'c' ('countryName' in X.500) attribute
type contains a two-letter ISO 3166 [ISO3166] country code.”
The two-l
* Neil McGovern , 2014-03-04, 18:19:
The review interface offers more than binary spam/ham classification.
These are the choices you have:
Out of interest, is the interface available to general DDs?
Yup, every DD can participate:
https://lists.debian.org/archive-spam-removals/review/
--
Jaku
Hi Jakub,
On 4 Mar 2014, at 17:40, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:13:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these messages are
>>> not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and clutter our views of our
>>> mailing lists
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:13:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. I hate to be *that guy*, but, these
messages are not spam. They are damaging, time wasting and clutter our
views of our mailing lists, this is true. Perhaps it is appropriate to
use the spam architectur
6 matches
Mail list logo
