On 08/31/2017 11:32 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI
heads-up"):
On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI
heads-up"):
> On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
> > do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
>
> The vendor should
On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Hi.
Summary:
Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
The vendor should apply for their own EANs. If Debian/SPI applies for
them it will provide a
Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI
heads-up"):
> I'm not sure whether this is splitting hairs, but wouldn't issuing a
> letter stating those 2 years make any similar request in the near
> future that demands a 2 years span, require reissuing a new letter?
>
Hi!
On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Summary:
>
> Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
> do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
> === draft letter ===
[…]
>4. Debian do not anticpate this situation
Hi.
Summary:
Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
Process:
We (Debian, me specifically) are about to ask Free Software
Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything
wrong
6 matches
Mail list logo
