Re: Appropriate escalation (or non-escalation) re rude emails

2017-10-25 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 25/10/17 18:36, Chris Lamb wrote: > However, I do not believe one needs standing to do so and would highly > encourage people to call out behaviour they feel is unacceptable, whoever > they are or whatever flags they have in the Debian LDAP server. > > Indeed, this is probably more effective

Re: Appropriate escalation (or non-escalation) re rude emails

2017-10-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Ian, > In the last week or so I have sent two mails to Debian contributors > saying to them that I felt their message was rude or otherwise had > inappropriate elements. Since becoming DPL I have sent a number of these with varying degrees of "success". However, I do not believe one needs

Appropriate escalation (or non-escalation) re rude emails

2017-10-25 Thread Ian Jackson
In the last week or so I have sent two mails to Debian contributors saying to them that I felt their message was rude or otherwise had inappropriate elements. Normally when I do this I get a reply saying "sorry, that's not what I meant" or "you are right and I was angry, I have written to XYZ to

Re: Bitcoin donations

2017-10-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"): > > Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you? > > After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my > (previously merely rather sceptical)

Re: Bitcoin donations

2017-10-25 Thread Ian Jackson
Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"): > Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you? After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my (previously merely rather sceptical) attitude to Bitcoin has hardenened. IMO Debian should not encourage or