On 25/10/17 18:36, Chris Lamb wrote:
> However, I do not believe one needs standing to do so and would highly
> encourage people to call out behaviour they feel is unacceptable, whoever
> they are or whatever flags they have in the Debian LDAP server.
>
> Indeed, this is probably more effective
Hi Ian,
> In the last week or so I have sent two mails to Debian contributors
> saying to them that I felt their message was rude or otherwise had
> inappropriate elements.
Since becoming DPL I have sent a number of these with varying degrees
of "success".
However, I do not believe one needs
In the last week or so I have sent two mails to Debian contributors
saying to them that I felt their message was rude or otherwise had
inappropriate elements.
Normally when I do this I get a reply saying "sorry, that's not what I
meant" or "you are right and I was angry, I have written to XYZ to
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"):
> > Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
>
> After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my
> (previously merely rather sceptical)
Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"):
> Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my
(previously merely rather sceptical) attitude to Bitcoin has
hardenened.
IMO Debian should not encourage or
5 matches
Mail list logo