On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 07:48:40AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Of course, I don't think Norbert was literal characterizing the
> situation as a gulag. I don't think anybody here thought he was. I
> don't think Norbert expected anybody to have an image of him starving
> to death or chilled in the
Le Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 05:35:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> Whether DD -> DM demotions will happen again and are going to become a
> new tool for solving social conflicts is an important decision that
> needs an open discussion where conesnsus is being sought.
Unsurprisingly there are
This entire thread is so cringy, this is likely my last reply.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 9:31 PM Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Please, all, get some perspective and stop with the comparisons to labor
> > camps, targeted killings, prisons
Paul R. Tagliamonte dijo [Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 10:36:08AM -0500]:
> > So where is the difference to a closed military court or gulag general?
>
> I strongly encourage you to read about Gulags and understand for both
> mlitary tribunal and prison camp, the result is often death. Debian can not
>
Em 27-12-2018 02:56, Daniel Pocock escreveu:
Hi all,
I have serious concerns about the current membership of the
anti-harassment team.
Specifically, I notice that Molly recently joined the team and she is
also a member of the Outreach team.
[...]
Regards,
Daniel
--
Debian Developer
On 27/12/18 12:04, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2018/12/27 06:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Specifically, I notice that Molly recently joined the team and she is
>> also a member of the Outreach team.
>>
>> This is not a personal attack on Molly, I simply believe that for
>> various reasons being in
On 27/12/18 12:30, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>
> Yet you fail to provide a shred of evidence here. My first guess would be
> that you don't have any.
In the case of this anti-harassment thread, as I clearly stated already,
it is not about evidence and is not about Molly personally, it is about
On 27/12/18 07:39, Geert Stappers wrote:
> } He threatened to ...
>
> Next time such thing happens, ask for clarifycation.
> To get sure the recieved "threat" was transmitted as threat.
>
> Adding a "why?" does help. Doing something with an answer to the why
> will get both parties further.
>
>
>
Le jeudi 27 décembre 2018 à 05:56:50+0100, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have serious concerns about the current membership of the
> anti-harassment team.
>
> Specifically, I notice that Molly recently joined the team and she is
> also a member of the Outreach team.
>
> This is not
On 2018/12/27 06:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Specifically, I notice that Molly recently joined the team and she is
> also a member of the Outreach team.
>
> This is not a personal attack on Molly, I simply believe that for
> various reasons being in both teams at the same time is incompatible for
On 27/12/18 11:17, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Dear Daniel.
>
> Daniel Pocock - 27.12.18, 05:41:
>> On 21/12/18 09:25, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>>> I agree with Russ that your framing of this is absolutely abhorrent.
>>> Your continued justification of it is digging a bigger hole. I beg
>>> you,
Dear Daniel.
Daniel Pocock - 27.12.18, 05:41:
> On 21/12/18 09:25, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > I agree with Russ that your framing of this is absolutely abhorrent.
> > Your continued justification of it is digging a bigger hole. I beg
> > you, please take a step back and reconsider your approach
12 matches
Mail list logo
