Re: Replace GNU bc?

2019-01-28 Thread Gavin Howard
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:14 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03:50AM -0700, Gavin Howard wrote: > > I am the author of an implementation of POSIX bc with all GNU > > extensions (https://github.com/gavinhoward/bc). > > > Would there be any interest in replacing the GNU bc

Re: Replace GNU bc?

2019-01-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03:50AM -0700, Gavin Howard wrote: > I am the author of an implementation of POSIX bc with all GNU > extensions (https://github.com/gavinhoward/bc). > Would there be any interest in replacing the GNU bc with my bc in > Debian? I would be willing to do the work to

Replace GNU bc?

2019-01-28 Thread Gavin Howard
Hello, I am the author of an implementation of POSIX bc with all GNU extensions (https://github.com/gavinhoward/bc). Some highlights: * It can be used in Linux kernel builds. * It is zero-dependency and builds without modification on any POSIX-compliant platform. * It has history without

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

2019-01-28 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 26/01/19 16:12, Sam Hartman wrote: > reasonably, I think that he's reached a level of The post wasn't intended to start a discussion about anybody specific, it is about the procedure.  Please don't shoot the messenger.  This tendency to make discussions personal, especially when somebody has a

defamation - "is this true?"

2019-01-28 Thread Daniel Pocock
A number of defamatory emails have been circulated recently in private in various communities, not just Debian. A number of people have been very kind to forward them to the people concerned and simply ask "Is this true?  Would you tell me what happened?" An email sent on debian-private, or