Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Carter: > On 2019/06/09 12:55, Jonas Meurer wrote: >> My hope is that having debian-mentors as an endorsed entry point for >> diving into Debian infrastructure would lower the entry barrier >> significantly for new contributors who'd like to dive into our >> infrastructure

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hi again, Jonas Meurer: > So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the > scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian > infrastructure software. > That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on > infrastruc-ture projects" in our docs

Re: Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Russ Allbery
"Chris Lamb" writes: > To elucidate, it was my understanding that the Socratic Method — at > least as the term is used today — refers to one interlocutor asking a > series of unfolding questions with the aim of leading another to reach a > particular point of view. I think the thing that most

Re: Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Sam, > Chris> Personally, I have been over-indulgent in using such "devil's > Chris> advocate" positions in the past but after some feedback I > Chris> realised that it did not have the intellectually stimulating > Chris> quality I was hoping for […] > > I'd be really

Re: Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Louis-Philippe" == Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes: Louis-Philippe> Is that more accessible? From what I understand from Louis-Philippe> your email, the beginning indentation isn't a Louis-Philippe> problem. If it is, we can script something to get Louis-Philippe> rid of

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hey Jonas On 2019/06/09 12:55, Jonas Meurer wrote: > So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the > scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian > infrastructure software. > That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on > infrastruc-ture

Re: Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 19-06-10 10 h 44, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Hi. > An issue came up processing a debconf budget amendment. > Our community uses ledger a lot for dealing with financial issues. > > Unfortunately, I find that its reports are not very accessible at least > by default. > The issue I'm most running

Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. An issue came up processing a debconf budget amendment. Our community uses ledger a lot for dealing with financial issues. Unfortunately, I find that its reports are not very accessible at least by default. The issue I'm most running into is that the reports use internal indentation within

Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Chris" == Chris Lamb writes: Chris> Personally, I have been over-indulgent in using such "devil's Chris> advocate" positions in the past, but after some feedback I Chris> realised that it did not have the intellectually stimulating Chris> quality I was hoping for and

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Adrian Bunk wrote: > […] I'm not sure whether this particular sub-thread is salvagable but I thought I might briefly share the below in order that it might prevent parallel cases elsewhere. There exists a particular argument style where one participant in the discussion asks a collection of

Fwd: Weryfikacja e-mail

2019-06-10 Thread deb...@maciejpiasecki.info
This is spam? (attachment) Mattai --- Begin Message --- Drogi uCytkowniku konta debian-user-pol...@lists.debian.org, W zesz2ym miesi5cu przekroczy2eB limit miejsca na swojej skrzynce pocztowej. MoCe to powodowa7 problemy, takie jak wiadomoBci e-mail, kt�re nie s5 wysy2ane