Re: Results of the Antiharassment Team Survey

2019-07-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Sam Hartman writes: > I understand Russ has some thoughts that I hope he'll be sharing soon. I'm afraid that for reasons unrelated to this discussion I'm not going to have the time or energy to try to expand on my thoughts, and am going to bow out of this thread. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.o

Re: Results of the Antiharassment Team Survey

2019-07-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
Thanks for trying to work this out. Comments inline. Scott K On July 13, 2019 2:23:15 AM UTC, Sam Hartman wrote: > >Hi. In this message I'm speaking as the DPL facilitating a discussion. >I'm trying to explain where I see the project consensus (or in this >case >lack there of). That is I'm ex

Re: Results of the Antiharassment Team Survey

2019-07-12 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. In this message I'm speaking as the DPL facilitating a discussion. I'm trying to explain where I see the project consensus (or in this case lack there of). That is I'm explaining what I'm hearing from the project and trying to focus future discussion. First, by this point, I have quite high

Re: Results of the Antiharassment Team Survey

2019-07-12 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Thanks -- but the link doesn't seem to work with Gmail (it somehow mangles it and tries to send to a nonexisting address). Googling for "gmail in-reply-to" didn't help either (all proposed solutions seem to require using an external mail client or even crafting the email message programmatically).

Re: git & Debian packaging sprint report

2019-07-12 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Scott, On Fri 12 Jul 2019 at 04:30am +00, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Has there been any analysis of the security implications of this > proposed service? Nothing formal, though of course we were thinking about it while we were working on it. > If I am understanding the description correctly