On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:37:58PM +, Dr. Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I would not like to make cooperation with upstream more complicated.
>
> I agree with that. However, I'm not sure if it would make it harder. How does
> this cooperation work, where you need your packaging to be on the same host
Le 13 septembre 2019 00:54:47 GMT+02:00, Yao Wei a écrit :
>On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:43:59PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> Living up to our own principles is a noble thing, but I'm not keen on
>> supporting such a GR as I think the drawbacks outweight the benefits
>for
>> the project.
>
Sam Hartman writes ("Debian and Non-Free Services"):
> I'm trying to move a thread from -devel.
>
> Ian Jackson responded [1] to part of a consensus discussion on Git
> recommendations. I had said that I think we recommend against the use
> of non-free services like Github but do not forbid
On 19-09-12 20 h 35, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On September 12, 2019 5:30:24 PM UTC, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to move a thread from -devel.
>>
>> Ian Jackson responded [1] to part of a consensus discussion on Git
>> recommendations. I had said that I think we recommend against
On September 14, 2019 12:29:19 AM GMT+09:00, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
>Is anyone actually doing that? I think this entire thread is nothing
>more
>than a stalking horse for Ian's crusade to get everyone to use dgit and
>we
>should just move on.
+100
Best comment till now. "Crusade" is the
On Friday, September 13, 2019 10:52:37 AM EDT Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "MJ" == MJ Ray writes:
> MJ> I have some sympathy with the "send a patch to bugs.debian.org"
> MJ> view. Do any developers ignore those and tell people to join
> MJ> github to use its private version of pull
> "MJ" == MJ Ray writes:
MJ> I have some sympathy with the "send a patch to bugs.debian.org"
MJ> view. Do any developers ignore those and tell people to join
MJ> github to use its private version of pull requests? I know I
MJ> have patches ignored in there but I don't
Fri Sep 13 12:06:35 GMT+01:00 2019 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
> чт, 12 сент. 2019 г. в 20:30, Sam Hartman :
> > For example, Vcs-Git fields in source packages must not refer to
> > proprietary git code management systems. Non-Debian services are
> > acceptable here so long as they are
Bas Wijnen wrote:
> note that the proposal is not to say "our users must not be allowed to use
> github". It's "our developers must not be allowed to force contributors to
> use github".
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain Debian packages. If you don't
> want
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:30:24PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
ZOMG.
IMO one of the less good ideas brought to this list. I will refrain from
further comments for everyones benefit, Ansgar brought up the most
relevant objections already.
--
cheers,
чт, 12 сент. 2019 г. в 20:30, Sam Hartman :
> Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
>
> No Debian contributor should be expected or encouraged, when working
> to improve Debian, to use non-free tools. This includes proprietary
> web services. We will ensure this, insofar as it is
On 12/09/2019 18:30, Sam Hartman wrote:
Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
No Debian contributor should be expected or encouraged, when working
to improve Debian, to use non-free tools. I don't believe that anyone within Debian will have a problem with this
statement.
This
On 15523 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote:
Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
I think the subject does not fit the content. Its more like "Forbid DDs
to use certain services".
No Debian contributor should be expected or encouraged, when working to
improve Debian, to use non-free
"Dr. Bas Wijnen" writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:49:26PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
>> > Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
>> >
>> > No Debian contributor should be expected or encouraged, when working
>> > to improve Debian, to use non-free tools.
>>
>> Does this include:
>>
>> -
14 matches
Mail list logo
