Re: Community Team - where we want to go

2019-10-09 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 2019/10/10 02:40, Norbert Preining wrote: > As "just another group of Debian Developers" I am not sure how you can > usurp the right to exegesis of the CoC? What about if another group XYZ > (like the Debian TeX Team) decides that our responsability is > Interpreting the Code of Conduct

Re: Community Team - where we want to go

2019-10-09 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi On Wed, 09 Oct 2019, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Name: Community Team > The team itself has no direct powers to enforce any decision, and > merely acts as an advisory body. It will aim to respond in a timely > Responsibilities include > * Interpreting the Code of Conduct; As "just another

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Charles Plessy
> On 10/5/19 1:10 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > I make this comment as the person who some years ago took the initiative > > to take over the "Debian" Github group, that was more or less abandonned > > and apparently not controlled by somebody related to Debian. It was a > > definitely a

Community Team - where we want to go

2019-10-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi folks, We've had a lot of conversations this year about where the Anti-Harassment (now *Community*) Team should be going: what we're trying to do, and the relationship we'd like to have with the rest of the project and the wider community. Within the team, we've brainstormed about this and

Re: I think We're Done: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Thomas" == Thomas Goirand writes: Thomas> Not discussing the issue itself, just (respectfully) Thomas> commenting on your reply. Thomas> If there's no valid reason to prefer Github, then it would Thomas> be very easy to just enforce the use only Salsa. Therefore,

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/9/19 4:16 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > On 10/5/19 11:42 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> No, it just means "This is the canonical location for the packaging >>> repository." Nothing more. There is no information about the workflow >>> preferred by the maintainer. >> >> So, if someone is not

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/5/19 11:42 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> No, it just means "This is the canonical location for the packaging >> repository." Nothing more. There is no information about the workflow >> preferred by the maintainer. > > So, if someone is not using Github's "advanced" features, like pull >

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, On 10/5/19 1:10 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > I make this comment as the person who some years ago took the initiative > to take over the "Debian" Github group, that was more or less abandonned > and apparently not controlled by somebody related to Debian. It was a > definitely a bitter

Re: Debian and Non-Free Services

2019-10-09 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, Ășt 8. 10. 2019 v 10:06 odesĂ­latel Michael Lustfield napsal: > + I can create branches that won't let me force push (git push -f) > + I can create projects that let me push to anything except master > https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/protected_branches.html -- Best regards