Timo Röhling writes:
> I would like to implement a cryptographic protocol that provides the
> same level of verifiability for secret votes as the currently used
> public votes. In particular, I would like to see some additional proof
> that the published hash values actually belong to eligible
* Adrian Bunk [2021-04-13 19:08:14]:
What improvements do you have in mind?
I would like to implement a cryptographic protocol that provides the
same level of verifiability for secret votes as the currently used
public votes. In particular, I would like to see some additional
proof that the
I broadly agree with your framing of this, Sam, with one particular point of
disagreement.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:17:30PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> 2) If your statements (even outside of Debian) commit you to a path that
> denies dignity, it's entirely reasonable for us to talk to you about
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
>...
> Also, I want to clarify that
> the current protocol with hash pseudonyms for secret voting in DPL elections
> is not in the Constitution either
>...
4.2.6 Votes are cast by email in a manner suitable to the Secretary.
> If you
> "Timo" == Timo Röhling writes:
Timo> * Pierre-Elliott Bécue [2021-04-13 11:19]:
>> I would rather not reserve any DEP for this right now. We
>> actually don't really know if any space for DEP text regarding
>> secret voting will be left out. The voting procedure is
>>
* Pierre-Elliott Bécue [2021-04-13 11:19]:
I would rather not reserve any DEP for this right now. We actually don't
really know if any space for DEP text regarding secret voting will be
left out. The voting procedure is historically described extensively in
the Constitution, and no DEP will be
Le mardi 13 avril 2021 à 10:55:33+0200, Timo Röhling a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> in anticipation of the fact that the Debian project might conduct more
> confidential votes on General Resolutions in the future, I would like to
> reserve DEP-16 for an improved voting procedure for confidential
Hello everyone,
in anticipation of the fact that the Debian project might conduct more
confidential votes on General Resolutions in the future, I would like to
reserve DEP-16 for an improved voting procedure for confidential votes.
My official approval as DD is pending, so I cannot add my
The board of the Free Software Foundation (FSF) have issued a statement
regarding the election of Richard Stallman:
https://www.fsf.org/news/statement-of-fsf-board-on-election-of-richard-stallman
Richard Stallman has issued a statement as well:
9 matches
Mail list logo
