Re: Confirmation email for joining the Debian User Forums

Dear Federico and Davide, On 4/19/21 4:16 PM, Davide Prina wrote: > Hi Federico, > > I'm only a Debian user, > > On 18/04/21 15:41, Federico Pacini wrote: > >> I have just signed up to the forum but unfortunately I have not yet >> received the confirmation email to confirm the registration. >>

Re: Confirmation email for joining the Debian User Forums

Hi Federico, I'm only a Debian user, On 18/04/21 15:41, Federico Pacini wrote: I have just signed up to the forum but unfortunately I have not yet received the confirmation email to confirm the registration. I tried to request the confirmation email again but I still can't receive it. I

Re: Creating a Debian Spending proposals and discussion mailing list

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Phil Morrell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:14:50PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > We could have a "debian/spending-ideas" if you want so that all DD have > > write access by default. We could restrict access to issues for project > > members (that automatically

Re: Creating a Debian Spending proposals and discussion mailing list

Now that the DPL voting is over, I'd like to ask Jonathan directly what you think of this idea in the context of your plans for an Expenditure policy? Could this fit alongside, help feed into it or is likely to be made obsolete? The thread starts here:

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 08:45 Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Yes, I agree with you. Thought my proposal was to change that fact (ie: > change the constitution) so we can give more power to Kurt. > Ah, got it. Yes, I also agree with you that this would be a good thing. :) >

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

* Sam Hartman [2021-04-19 07:03]: I thought you were focused on the voting mechanism not so much on the constitutional changes. I think this question belongs to that constitutional discussion. It was not my intention segue into the constitutional discussion, I was merely looking to enumerate

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

> "Timo" == Timo Röhling writes: Timo> * Stéphane Glondu [2021-04-16 17:12]: >> I would be glad to help :-) Timo> Great! >>> With all that being said and having made my case, I am open for >>> any reasonably secure solution (including Belenios) that we can >>> agree

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On 4/19/21 5:26 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Most of us in Debian take privacy very > seriously, let's extend that to our votes as well. Let's not mix words. We're talking about secrecy here, not privacy. IMO, completely open votes are also nice, it's just that in the RMS vote context, it wasn't

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On 4/19/21 5:58 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi zigo, > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Goirand > wrote: > > > I'd be very much for leaving the decision of open/close to our > secretary, with most votes open, and the possibility for him to decide > when

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:58:55PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi zigo, > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > > > I'd be very much for leaving the decision of open/close to our > > secretary, with most votes open, and the possibility for him to decide > > when it