On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:50 AM Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:12:21AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> > Do we have to start by making it a mandatory switch? I don't feel consensus
> > to
> > move to discourse will be impossible in
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:48 AM Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:22:53AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > Would you be willing to list out which points it is from the given
> > "cons" category which you see as positives?
> >
>
> I'd really rather not at this stage, as I'm
Tina,
Sorry a little late to this thread, but I wanted you to know that I fully
support any individual's choices when it comes to their own gender
representation, sexual identification and preferences. I understand and
support your recent expressed anger. Baiting and attacking minority groups
is
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:26 AM, sai11101...@gmail.com wrote:
We the students of IIIT Hyderabad (https://iiit.ac.in
https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fiiit.ac.insa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNFMgVcVzfdLIP6a-9Vqbq2lVGNXHA),
as part of our research on improving the features provided by Bug Tracking
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:11 PM, John Simmons simmonstrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I was thinking about making some hats with the debian logo on them, and
selling them to some friends, and possibly putting them on my website for
sale. I found this page https://www.debian.org/logos/#open-use
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
On 17/11/2014 10:15, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/11/14 at 16:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
However, this is not a reason to bounce my email from -www@ to -project@
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
...
=== Tax-exemption status ===
* debian.ch did not apply for tax-exempt status, because the additional
bureaucracy and limitations outweigh the advantages at the moment.
* debian.ch is subject to tax on earnings if our
Obviously, consensus is that blobs were, and still are, essential for
Linux's status as a popular commercially viable OS.
I'm wondering at the same time if they are considered a necessary
evil, and wonder if there would be support [1] to try to work together
with vendors to free the firmware
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
We are now ready to announce a first official list of Debian Trusted
Organizations, per the process defined in the Debian Constitution §5.1.11
and §9, and after the
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Anthony Towns a...@erisian.com.au wrote:
Hello world,
Would anyone else be supportive of a proposal to set a term for tech ctte
membership?
The current tech ctte members were appointed:
Ian: May/Dec 1998 (15 years, 5 months) [0]
Bdale: Apr 2001 (13
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Marc Haber writes (Re: A question about patches for upstream):
I understand. Unfortunately, Debian has a number of developers that
are quite impolite while doing their work. In a real company, such
people would
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
Someone complained about a lengthy off-topic discussion taking place on
debian-private, and suggested to move it to a public mailing list.
A follow-up to this. In response to the
If you are interested in participating in the below discussion (which
I just kicked off) please consider joining:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-sponsors-discuss
and sharing your thoughts.
Thanks,
Brian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brian Gupta brian.gu
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On 22/02/14 at 20:57 -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
Has there been any analysis of how active the developers are? I'd
hazard to guess that a good number should be moved to emeritus status.
Perhaps we should
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Sune Vuorela writes (Re: GR proposal: code of conduct):
Much of irc are semiprivate chatter and socializing and not really
something that should be available to the wider public.
I don't think this is
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
Hi,
I believe every new DD or DM should be auto subscribed to -devel, -project and
-devel-announce (and -private for DDs), best with the usual someone
subscribed you for this, please confirm confirmation mail, not sure
On Jan 7, 2014 3:48 AM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
Op 05-01-14 14:28, Joerg Jaspert schreef:
On 13446 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm worried that this situation is harmful for the project.
Yes, seperate development with different requirements than the
production
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 08:13:29PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
assess their
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Marc Haber
mh+debian-proj...@zugschlus.de wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google
recruiters.
So they basically take our DD selection process as a filter to weed
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
Inevitably, the CoC will be voted on in a GR. The right time to
continue this dogpile is in the vote.
Mh… we’ll see how that turns out.
Norbert Preining writes (Re: Code of
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Camaleón noelamac+gm...@gmail.com writes:
The mailing list managers/admins have the right to ban whoever they
decide, but in the aim of fair play, the user should also have the
right to defend him/herself from the
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards
having clear guidelines for what is acceptable and what isn't in terms
of
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Paul Wise
About the archive mirrors, some reworded thoughts from the DPL IRC
channel when this came up a few days ago:
pabs [...] I think the current state of affairs is fine;
I don't believe you're one of the person
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@ftbfs.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri Jun 21, 2013 at 14:57:09 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
o) User and Group Management:
Last year we estimated the number of active shell accounts to be on
the order of 50.000 over all users/hosts. We
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Peter Palfrader wea...@debian.org wrote:
Comrades!
We just finished a very productive Debian System Administration team
sprint in LinuxHotel, Essen, Germany. All six of the current DSA
members (Faidon, Luca, Martin, Peter, Stephen, Tollef) and our recruit
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:03 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
site requesting user's charity
You mean user's involvement. You don't want users to be invited to
participate in Debian. Debian isn't elitist and it shouldn't care
I finally had a chance to discuss with our legal counsel, and have
some answers to the questions raised in the discussion.
The summary of the QA is (from list and some of my own):
1) Does registering logo require any changes to TM policy?
A: No changes required
2) What are the costs to register
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
So, some updates:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:59:06AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
I'm wondering if there can be a guidelines/advice section also? For
example, perhaps we want to capture something along the lines
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On 21-05-13 11:37, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all,
On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
1. Do not flame, use foul language, or in general be abusive or
disrespectful towards other people on the mailinglists or
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
The next DPL helpers meeting is tomorrow on #debian-dpl:
2013-05-14 Tue 17:00 (date -d @1368550800)
The agenda is online[1]. If you are listed on one of the pending
actions, it would be great if you could describe
Hi all,
I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times.
Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered
(and treated by our current Trademark policy) as a common law
trademark, in that
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
Hi all,
I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
Yes, the swirl alone.
Could it be trademarked? I
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:58:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
Hi all,
I have
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:35:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
If not, we can do mission-specific fund raising, I wouldn't mind that
either, as
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
[ Mail-Followup-To: -project ]
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:57:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This policy states that the contact for trademark questions is
tradem...@debian.org. Where does this address go? I
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
I'm currently hacking on the maven-repo-helper package. The source code
contains copyright statements from the original author. Now when I add
classes
it
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@soziologie.ch wrote:
Philip Hands p...@hands.com writes:
Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org writes:
...
[...]
\item You cannot alter the DEBIAN trademarks in any way.
[...]
\item Any scaling must retain the original
Moray,
I am willing to help if you don't have enough folks. A couple caveats:
1) I am moving this week, so will likely not have full time computer access
until next Monday.
2) I am currently not planning on attending DC13. (Things could change, if
I am really needed onsite, and I can break free
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Chris Taylor ctay...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:41:29 -0500
Fernando C. Estrada fcestr...@fcestrada.com wrote:
Currently the available options are:
ask.debian.net
shapado.debian.net (current)
+1 to ask...
-Brian
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Fernando C. Estrada
fcestr...@fcestrada.com wrote:
El mié, 29-09-2010 a las 10:04 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli escribió:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:39:13PM -0500, Fernando C. Estrada wrote:
I like the idea, currently I'm in the Shapado instance for Debian [1]
41 matches
Mail list logo
