Re: Evolving away from source package realms

2022-10-12 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Didier Raboud (2022-10-07 15:24:23) > (This is the continuation of an unspecified thread in the debian-private list > that generated enough positive content that I deemed it smart enough to jump > off from it, to a public mailing list. I'm not quoting anything from anyone, > but

Re: Keysigning in times of COVID-19

2020-08-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Enrico, thanks for bringing this up. Quoting Enrico Zini (2020-08-06 17:54:21) > What do you think could be alternative key signing policies, that would be > acceptable to you, that would not require traveling and meeting face to face? I'm currently in the situation of sponsoring a very

Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)

2016-12-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Lars Wirzenius (2016-12-06 16:06:30) > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:50:12PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Actually, this is a great argument for why this information should be in a > > deb822 field in the source package itself. > > FWIW, I think this is th

Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)

2016-12-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
'josch' Schauer]] while the maintainer field is > > Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org>, that obviously breaks a string match. > > the email on the wiki page is also a different one… maybe whoever implemented or understands the algorithm that is used by the PTS to parse the wiki page sh

Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)

2016-12-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-06 09:36:08) > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > What I currently find inconvenient about the LowThresholdNmu page is, that > > it > > is external to the source package. So after having found a packag

Formal declaration of weak package ownership in source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)

2016-12-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-12-05 23:04:48) > Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers [and > 1 more messages]"): > > A similar proposal: Have a way of declaring the package to be under > > collective maintenance (put it under collab-maint on alioth + > >

Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers

2016-12-02 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-12-02 13:11:05) > I'm just commenting on this single issue (and aspect of it…) here+now… > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:20:36PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:46:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > 3. Abolish maintainership

Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers

2016-12-02 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-12-02 12:43:52) > Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers"): > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:46:05PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > 3. Abolish maintainership entirely. > > > > This is the obviously right solution. > > I can see