On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:05:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (Please note: this response is based mostly on the information included in
> your message. I only looked cursorily at the actual license of Pale Moon
> to confirm that it looks very non-free by our definitions.)
>
I /believe/ that t
fidelis writes:
> Btw in in regards to a conversation I had with one of you about Pale
> Moon browser being added to the repository and them saying you weren't
> allowed to.
> "Repository/package maintainers are free to add unaltered versions of
> the Linux browser to their repositories. Noncomm
Btw in in regards to a conversation I had with one of you about Pale Moon
browser being added to the repository and them saying you weren't allowed
to.
"Repository/package maintainers are free to add unaltered versions of the
Linux browser to their repositories. Noncommercial, Open Source operatin
On Jo, 12 mar 15, 12:50:17, fidelis wrote:
> Hello,
Hi fidelis,
> I just wanted to know if you have any plans to add Pale Moon browser to the
> repository. If not would you consider it?
Just for your information, debian-project is dedicated to non-technical
discussions. Informat
Hello,
I just wanted to know if you have any plans to add Pale Moon browser to the
repository. If not would you consider it? Here's a link to the website
http://www.palemoon.org/, sourceforge page
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pm4linux/ and redistribution license
http://www.palemoo
5 matches
Mail list logo
