a worldwide community
organisation.
Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> writes:
> The link [to a 2014 Mozilla weblog article] does not support the claim
> that [Mozilla accepting Bitcoin donation] was a net negative. The link
> you site claims that sticking bitcoin donations *
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> writes:
>> And why would you refuse a way to submit donations that's
>> convenient for some donors?
Ben> [...]
Ben> Mozilla tried it and the result was a net negative:
Ben>
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 16:15 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"):
> > > Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
> >
> &
* Adam Borowski:
> I consider Bitcoin to still be far less repulsive than both the mainstream
> banking system and para-banks like Paypal.
Many countries have a long tradition of banking cooperatives, which
could provide a third option.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"):
> > Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
>
> After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my
> (previo
Elise Wood writes ("Bitcoin donations"):
> Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
After reading _Attack of the 50-foot blockchain_ by David Gerard, my
(previously merely rather sceptical) attitude to Bitcoin has
hardenened.
IMO Debian should
Have you considered adding an address for bitcoin donations? Would you?
7 matches
Mail list logo