On la, 2010-11-13 at 20:12 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever?
> Or should we suggest that they can also shorten them to, say, "2010, J.
> Random Hacker"? I'm fine w
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:23:47AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On su, 2010-11-14 at 12:59 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear Lars and everybody,
here are two answers and a proposition for editorial changes.
> * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> verbatim, inc
On su, 2010-11-14 at 12:59 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Lars and everybody,
>
> here are two answers and a proposition for editorial changes.
>
>
> > * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> > verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever
Dear Lars and everybody,
here are two answers and a proposition for editorial changes.
> * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever?
Given that the upstream authors are somtimes themselves inconsisten
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:12:15 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
> verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever?
> Or should we suggest that they can also shorten them to, say, "2010, J.
> Random Hacker"? I'm fin
A couple more points about DEP5:
* Should we suggest people keep the upstream copyright statements
verbatim, including the word "Copyright" or c-in-a-circle or whatever?
Or should we suggest that they can also shorten them to, say, "2010, J.
Random Hacker"? I'm fine with either. Currently the exam
6 matches
Mail list logo
