On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Technical hint: subpages syntax in Moin can be quite frustrating,
especially for those who do not often edit Moin pages. It might be
useful to have some sample (dangling) links for subpages pointing to
alternative positions
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:03:59PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I've now finished doing that: JessieReleaseProcess
is now a subpage of Debate, and AlwaysReleasableTesting a subpage of
JessieReleaseProcess, as recommended in /Debate. I've fixed all the
links I've found,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:19:08AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Question: there are various overlaps from this proposal and DEPs
( http://dep.debian.net/ ). Not only in some of the explicit goals you
state (e.g. documenting the state of discussions), but also in the fact
that other FOSS
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:06:57PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
I really like this idea. The only problem I have is: How to know in
advance whether a debate might concern a difficult development issue
or not.
I don't think there's any need to define criteria for when writing
essays are
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
The executive summary: We'd like to see more thoughtful debates
of important Debian development issues, and have created
http://wiki.debian.org/Debate as a way to encourage them.
Dear Lars and Russ, thanks for this initiative. I
Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:45:08PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
We think discussions on Debian development mailing lists sometimes
suffer from repetition of facts, opinions, and arguments. During a
long discussion of a controversial topic, it is hard for anyone to
keep track of what has
Op donderdag 9 mei 2013 23:40:45 schreef Wouter Verhelst:
I do agree that sometimes, mailinglists aren't the best possible medium
to hold a discussion. However, I'm not convinced that your proposal is
the best way to fix that. I think that with all its flaws, mailinglists
(and/or usenet) are
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 20:45 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
This e-mail is jointly from Lars Wirzenius and Russ Allbery.
The executive summary: We'd like to see more thoughtful debates
of important Debian development issues, and have created
http://wiki.debian.org/Debate as a way to encourage
Hi,
On 09-05-13 21:45, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
We think discussions on Debian development mailing lists sometimes
suffer from repetition of facts, opinions, and arguments. During a
long discussion of a controversial topic, it is hard for anyone to
keep track of what has been said, and so
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
This is probably true. However, I'm not convinced your proposal solves
more problems than it introduces:
- First, I find it extremely difficult to follow a discussion on a wiki
page. Yes, there is a diff feature in most wikis (including ours), but
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
- First, I find it extremely difficult to follow a discussion on a wiki
page. Yes, there is a diff feature in most wikis (including ours), but
that requires you to remember when you last read the position on the
wiki page in
11 matches
Mail list logo
