My position on this, as the linux.* administrator:
- addresses munging will make the gateway harder to use and will break
by-author search with google (I believe that the archiving by google
groups is one of the most important benefits of the gateway).
I believe this to be important enough
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
And it is properly implemented as a web-based NNTP client. I've no
idea why people insist on reimplementing NNTP badly, complete with
client lock-in, in these forum things.
Animated GIF emoticons.
--
Sam.
Hi everyone,
I'd like to do something about the situation we currently have
where people's email addresses are currently shown on both the list
archives, and on news. I have talked to a number of people about this
situation over the last few weeks, and I have not been able to find
any
On 2003-11-19 14:39:29 + Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I see it, we have two solutions to this problem.
You appear to be solving side-effects, not the problem. The problem
seems to be the number of insecure vulnerable machines out there.
If we mung header email
On 2003-11-19 18:41:40 + Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based forums *shudder*, which you could monitor via e-mail. I'd
hate that, but if we want to cater for users I suppose we could
duplicate the debian-user-* lists on such a system.
This is an interesting extra idea, but no
5 matches
Mail list logo
