Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for votes

2016-10-20 Thread Bas Wijnen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks Ian, for summarizing the options. I have a slight disagreement with your interpretation though. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:16:15PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I support both Option 2 ("Acknowledge difficulty", my proposal) and > Option 3 ("Rem

Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for votes

2016-10-17 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Ian Jackson dijo [Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:16:15PM +0100]: > Charles Plessy writes ("Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for > votes"): > > out of context, it is hard to chose between the options that each of you are > > presenting in this GR. > >

Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for votes

2016-10-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Charles Plessy writes ("Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for votes"): > out of context, it is hard to chose between the options that each of you are > presenting in this GR. > > Could you briefly rebut each other's options ? I think that it would he

Re: GR: Declassifying debian-private: second call for votes

2016-10-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > This is the second call for votes. > > Voting period starts 2016-10-09 00:00:00 UTC > Votes must be received by 2016-10-22 23:59:59 UTC > > The following ballot is for voting on declass