Micah Anderson mi...@riseup.net writes:
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
[Adding and M-F-T-ing -project]
[...]
Were you there? Were Debian funds spend on this endeavor? What
happened there? Most importantly, why is it all so secretive?
Did I miss a response to these questions? I'm
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
[Adding and M-F-T-ing -project]
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I want to point out that Luk's mail was not in any way discussed in the
release team. I think it is horrible.
I welcome everyone to critize the
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:14:45PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
We are in an election period and I would like for the project
to elect a DPL who not only does not support a certain level
of non-transparency, but is actively intolerant of it.
I do not know whether or not we have any potential
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:09:43PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
To that end, it would be nice to have a specific question posed on
-vote: that venue is IMHO more appropriate to answer your question than
-project. (Or just prod the candidates to follow-up there if the above
is already the
On Mon Mar 15 05:16, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/03/msg00011.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00080.html
So it wasn't that secret after all. (Note that all
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:18:54PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be informed
about
a meeting of a team you are not a part of?
I'm confused as to why multiple DDs don't seem to understand
what transparency means.
--
To
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Matthew Johnson wrote:
I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be
informed about a meeting of a team you are not a part of?
If a team is meeting, the meeting and agenda should be announced, and
the decisions and discussions which occur in the meeting
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:24:51PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Matthew Johnson wrote:
I'm confused as to why you are expecting to be involved in or be
informed about a meeting of a team you are not a part of?
If a team is meeting, the meeting and agenda should be
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:14:45PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
That meeting took place in May of last year. What's the point of discussing
it almost 9 months later? What exactly triggered your blog post?
We are in an election period
[Adding and M-F-T-ing -project]
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I want to point out that Luk's mail was not in any way discussed in the
release team. I think it is horrible.
I welcome everyone to critize the release team. I would prefer help, of
Clint Adams wrote:
[Adding and M-F-T-ing -project]
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
I want to point out that Luk's mail was not in any way discussed in the
release team. I think it is horrible.
I welcome everyone to critize the release team. I would
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Clint Adams wrote:
Okay, so when there is a mysterious release team meeting in Cambridge,
and there is no discussion or planning of it on debian-release [...]
Clint,
Although to some level I agree with you [1], I wonder if you could explain
one thing.
That meeting
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
Okay, so when there is a mysterious release team meeting in Cambridge,
and there is no discussion or planning of it on debian-release, or
#debian-release, or anywhere else public that I can see
[...]
Were you there?
No.
Were Debian funds spend on this
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Although to some level I agree with you [1], I wonder if you could explain
one thing.
That meeting took place in May of last year. What's the point of discussing
it almost 9 months later? What exactly triggered your blog post?
We
* Clint Adams:
Okay, so when there is a mysterious release team meeting in Cambridge,
and there is no discussion or planning of it on debian-release, or
#debian-release, or anywhere else public that I can see,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/03/msg00011.html
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
The whole thing about secrecy is exagerated AFAICS as there just is not
much to tell. The reason these things mostly remain private is that
there is not much to tell and making things public without the consent
of everyone involved is not done.
A general
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2010-03-14 16:09:34 CET]:
[1] I think release management for (old)stable is being handled quite well
ATM.
While this might be true and valid for stable, I am not too convinced
that the last point release of oldstable from April 8th of last year is
too much for
On Sunday 14 March 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2010-03-14 16:09:34 CET]:
[1] I think release management for (old)stable is being handled quite
well ATM.
While this might be true and valid for stable, I am not too convinced
that the last point release of
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/03/msg00011.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00080.html
So it wasn't that secret after all. (Note that all this happened last
year, including Luk's
19 matches
Mail list logo
