Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
Too few MUAs have a button for don't bother me about new mail
in this (sub-)thread.
I wish all off-topic mails were marked with OT tag in the subject,
dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with VAC) to a
different
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Personally I like also that debian-private carries strong personal
opinion (instead of public mailing list).
I don't think I'm able to interpret the above properly. If that is to
mean that on -private you don't need to be
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are
send to d-d-a (which is the only
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization.
Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America,
Hy-Brazil, Eurasia, and Scandinavia are
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:16:10PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization.
Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether
On 10.06.2010 16:16, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization.
Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads.
I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America,
Hello,
there is a discussion in debian-private about the role of
debian-private. There is nothing private in that discussion, so I'm
following it up here.
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact that that idea is being very vocally pushed
On 09.06.2010 16:08, Enrico Zini wrote:
Hello,
there is a discussion in debian-private about the role of
debian-private. There is nothing private in that discussion, so I'm
following it up here.
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are
send to d-d-a (which is the only required list for DD).
Why would we not be better served if the
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a
important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are send
to d-d-a (which is the only
Re: Enrico Zini 2010-06-09 20100609140853.ga3...@enricozini.org
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact that that idea is being very vocally pushed by no
less than two people prompts me to double check some fundamental facts
about the Debian
[Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
Too few MUAs have a button for don't bother me about new mail
in this (sub-)thread.
I wish all off-topic mails were marked with OT tag in the subject,
dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with VAC) to a
different mailbox for me.
How about at least
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
Too few MUAs have a button for don't bother me about new mail
in this (sub-)thread.
I wish all off-topic mails were marked with OT tag in the subject,
dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with VAC) to
13 matches
Mail list logo
