Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-10-02 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, > We're still missing (partially or completely): > - generate a signing template for GRUB2 > - have DAK accept those generated source-only uploads Grub2 support was finished, and how about DAK? Currently, what is the blocker for secure boot support? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henric

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-06-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 07:50:15AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Just a ping question, is there any progress for grub2 package? > If not, what's the blocker for it? I had an email conversation with Philipp Hahn about this. The main substance of my reply was: I can't easily review this as it

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-06-18 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Just a ping question, is there any progress for grub2 package? If not, what's the blocker for it? On Wed, 16 May 2018 10:05:21 +0200 Philipp Hahn wrote: > Moin, > > Am 15.05.2018 um 11:41 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:16:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > >> On Tue

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 10:05 +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote: > Moin, > > Am 15.05.2018 um 11:41 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:16:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:00AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > > > On Tue, 15 May 2018 03:32:26 +0100 Ben Hu

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-16 Thread Philipp Hahn
Moin, Am 15.05.2018 um 11:41 schrieb Steve McIntyre: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:16:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:00AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 03:32:26 +0100 Ben Hutchings >>> wrote: >> The second point (have DAK accept ...) is

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:16:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:00AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: >> On Tue, 15 May 2018 03:32:26 +0100 >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > > > The second point (have DAK accept ...) is part of step 7, yes. It >> > > > seems to have been implem

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:00AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 03:32:26 +0100 > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > The second point (have DAK accept ...) is part of step 7, yes. It > > > > seems to have been implemented now. > > > > > > Then, remaining blocker is only template f

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Tue, 15 May 2018 03:32:26 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The second point (have DAK accept ...) is part of step 7, yes. It > > > seems to have been implemented now. > > > > Then, remaining blocker is only template for GRUB2? > > For testing purposes, I think so. I don't know whether

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 11:07 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the clarification, Ben. Very helpful. > > On Mon, 14 May 2018 15:35:50 +0100 > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > The second point (have DAK accept ...) is part of step 7, yes. It > > seems to have been implemented now. > > T

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Thanks for the clarification, Ben. Very helpful. On Mon, 14 May 2018 15:35:50 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > The second point (have DAK accept ...) is part of step 7, yes. It > seems to have been implemented now. Then, remaining blocker is only template for GRUB2? -- Regards, Hideki Y

Re: Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 22:05 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, your explanation is really helpful. > > > > The signing service is a source package builder. > > It build source package but its source package is based on built binary > package? > As I understand, singing to binary

Re: Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-14 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Thanks, your explanation is really helpful. > The signing service is a source package builder. It build source package but its source package is based on built binary package? As I understand, singing to binary is necessary step. 1. source package 2. -> upload to dak 3. -> passed to bu

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-13 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Hideki Yamane > Hi, > > > In the end, we decided to have a signing service which will construct > > a source package based on a "template" package and a list of files to > > sign and upload this to be processed by the normal buildd and dak > > processes. The signing service will also have an

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-05-07 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, > In the end, we decided to have a signing service which will construct > a source package based on a "template" package and a list of files to > sign and upload this to be processed by the normal buildd and dak > processes. The signing service will also have an audit log which makes > it publ

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-04-30 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ian Jackson > > Once this was agreed and various corner cases ironed out, we started > > implementing the signing service, and the necessary changes in the > > Linux kernel package, dak, fwupdate, shim and grub. The source for the > > signing service can be found at > > https://salsa.debian.or

Re: UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-04-30 Thread Ian Jackson
Tollef Fog Heen writes ("UEFI Secure Boot sprint report"): > In the end, we decided to have a signing service which will construct > a source package based on a "template" package and a list of files to > sign and upload this to be processed by the normal buildd and

UEFI Secure Boot sprint report

2018-04-29 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
People from the FTP team, kernel team and DSA, as well as other interested individuals met in Fulda, Germany for a sprint with the goal of deciding and implementing the workflow for Secure Boot. Participants * Ansgar Burchardt * Joerg Jaspert * Luke W. Faraone * Ben Hutchings * Tolle