Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

Hi! Daniel Sousa dan...@sousa.me writes: On 19/08/15 23:08, Riley Baird wrote: What about get.debian.org ? (There is get.debian.net) Off-topic, but I just had a look at get.debian.net, and it uses Google Analytics, which seems strange for a Debian site. Also, it's broken. All links return a

Re: Moving to stronger keys than 1024D

Moin! Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes: The more useful question is how many of the signatures on your new key come from strong keys, and how many strong keys have you signed with that new key? Right. If you happen to have a oneliner to verify that I'll be happy to answer these

Re: OpenPGP keysigning: alternate encodings for fingerprint exchange

Hi! Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: I think that hexadecimal is a fairly poor pre-encoding for information exchange via data to speech and speech to data engines (aka voice boxes, brains and fingers). Reading out and typing long strings of hexadecimal digits at OpenPGP keysignings is

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 ?

Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:41:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining Upstream why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to be distributed in

Re: Debian training and code review

Hi! Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org writes: I'd love it to see it eventually go a step up, like having some review process by people with especially strong experience, and having them published by an own blog (à-la debian-administration) where they can be archived and searched. But that's