Re: Packaging a Python program

2001-10-05 Thread Anthony Roach
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:12:35PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > > 1) Should I byte compile the scons script? > > No. I assume its a shell script called /usr/bin/scons. There is no need > to byte-compile it. It's actually a Python script. Currently it has a lot of code in it (to parse argume

Re: Packaging a Python program

2001-10-05 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
Anthony, Anthony Roach wrote: 1) Should I byte compile the scons script? No. I assume its a shell script called /usr/bin/scons. There is no need to byte-compile it. 2) Since the SCons.* modules work fine in all versions of Python supported by all current versions of Debian, can I put them in som

Re: (another set of) experimental packages (1.5, 2.1, 2.2a4)

2001-10-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Donovan Baarda writes: > Some other questions; > > what happens with other packages that might/might not have installed > stuff into /usr/lib/python1.5? Will they break? No. However the priority of the python alternative from 1.5 should greater than the prio of the pyton from 2.x (at least for so