Re: python transition and python-xml

On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Hi, I need the python-xml package to rebuild some of my packages (python-gtk, python-gtk2, python-gnome2, python-pyorbit, rubrica), but python-xml is away from unstable because of transition. Several packages use

Re: python 2.2 to python 2.3 transition

Le lun 11/08/2003 à 01:04, Donovan Baarda a écrit : you end up with multiple packages where the only difference is the versioned depends on python not very efficient. I'm not saying it is efficient, but it is simple and it works. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' :

Re: python transition and python-xml

Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now), and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a DD). I was planning to ask someone on the list to sponsor the upload if I don't get

Re: python transition and python-xml

Quoting Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yesterday was saturday, and I don't read my mail on week ends. The updated package is in progress (i.e. pbuilder is running right now), and I have contacted Jerome Marant who's my usual sponstor (I'm not a DD). I was planning to ask someone

Re: python 2.2 to python 2.3 transition

Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo's in this directory upon upgrade. Matthias, do you think it

#!/usr/bin/python2.3 vs #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

Hello, Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems, these are the same. The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 is wrong because he has his own python2.3 on the path

Re: #!/usr/bin/python2.3 vs #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

John Goerzen writes: Hello, Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems, these are the same. The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 is wrong because he has his

Re: #!/usr/bin/python2.3 vs #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 06:50, John Goerzen wrote: Hello, Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems, these are the same. The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

Re: python 2.2 to python 2.3 transition

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote: Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo's in

Re: python 2.2 to python 2.3 transition

Hi, Donovan Baarda wrote: Using this the python package can notify all packages that depend on it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them; That would work for me too, of course. egrep ^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYTHONXY([ ,]|$) | \ That regexp looks like it should look like this instead: