Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2
as well is not a good solution in my opinion.
Modem users must spend an extra hour downloading just to get a tiny
package too.
Quoting John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian systems,
these are the same.
The submitter in #189473 claims that #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 is wrong
Quoting Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Many Python programs use constructs like #!/usr/bin/env python2.3 to load
themselves. Many others use #!/usr/bin/python2.3. On most Debian
systems,
these are the same.
The submitter in
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:54, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Donovan Baarda wrote:
Using this the python package can notify all packages that depend on
it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them;
That would work for me too, of course.
egrep ^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYTHONXY([ ,]|$) |
I've put a summary of packages needing a rebuild in a world-writable
file at http://people.debian.org/~joss/python-list.txt
Please mark your uploads (maintainer or non-maintainer) in this file
(gluck:~joss/public_html/python-list.txt). This is probably the time to
start NMU's for library
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
| On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
| Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
| changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
| (not the pythonX.Y
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 16:45, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Hi,
python-tal is maintained by the QA team so I thought I'd help and NMU
it.
I added a python2.3-tal package and it built correctly but the
no-version package (python-tal) still depends upon python2.2-tal (I
changed
Josselin Mouette wrote :
What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
expected.
Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as default python
version (waiting for python-bsddb3). I don't have
Josselin Mouette writes:
I've put a summary of packages needing a rebuild in a world-writable
file at http://people.debian.org/~joss/python-list.txt
python-numarray-ext = updated but the new package misses python (= 2.3),
python ( 2.4)
unneeded, as it depends on python-numarray.
anyway,
Le mar 12/08/2003 à 18:52, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote :
What version of python is installed on your system ? Your packages built
fine on my system and made python-tal depend on python2.3-tal as
expected.
Great. I had python 2.3 installed but not yet as default
Hi,
This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment.
Meanwhile, I'm
Joey Hess wrote:
Josip Rodin wrote:
Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
every time python* is mentioned? :P
Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same set of problems
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Well, I haven't had any python-related collisions from the pythonX.Y
scheme... python (= 2.2), python ( 2.3) I've seen, of course... it
would be so much nicer if someone added debian support to distutils,
though ;-) (*hint*)
13 matches
Mail list logo
