Le lun 24 juillet 2006 16:26, Joey Hess a écrit :
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
dpkg-repack (from sid dpkg 1.13.22) gives warnings when repacking
python packages:
...
warning, `./dpkg-repack-5343/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined
field `Python-Version'
...
What effect does this
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Version
(both are available only at build time), but I fail to see
Le lun 24 juillet 2006 19:52, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Version
(Thanks for the CC.)
Matthias Klose wrote:
I haven't yet seen any reasoning why people are seeing that
information as cluttering the database or just as ugly.
Causing unrelated programs like dpkg-repack to spew warning messages is,
by definition, ugly.
Using X- fields, which are intended for
* Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
provide the same information to pycentral?
^^^
just looking at
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 02:07 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
provide the same information to
6 matches
Mail list logo
