Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 08 octobre 2007 à 15:59 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : The following packages need a round of binNMUs as soon as possible, to build extensions for python2.5, after which they shouldn't bother us. Can anyone schedule the binNMUs please? bitpim Please don't bother with

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but the fact they are private makes this process more complicated. ... particularly given that neither python-support (which BitPim currently uses) nor python-central actually

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 14:44 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but the fact they are private makes this process more complicated. ... particularly given that neither

Re: Report on the situation of python2.5 in Debian

2007-10-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
[-release dropped, as this subthread is no longer on topic.] Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If anyone has ideas about how to deal with such cases, I'm all open for implementing them. It would be easy for python-support to maintain a list of files that should be symbolic links to

Re: Tool support for private modules

2007-10-11 Thread Ben Finney
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 10:50 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit : The main reason I use distutils is to assist those people using operating systems that *don't* have good package dependency management, which seems to be the primary target market for