Le dimanche 18 octobre 2009 à 10:31 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
=
override_dh_pysupport:
dh_pysupport /usr/share/backintime/
=
Is this necessary? Why can't ‘dh_pysupport’ do this without being
overridden here?
Yes, dh_pysupport only looks at /usr/share/$package
and
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the
next release […]
I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm
ending up with a source package that
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:31:02AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Thanks, ‘backintime’ does indeed meet these criteria.
The ‘debian/rules’ file is doing some things that I'm confused about:
=
override_dh_auto_clean:
rm -rf locale common/po/*.mo
find $(CURDIR) -name
Ben Finney wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Do you object to spelling-error-in-binary,
duplicated-key-in-desktop-entry, embedded-zlib, duplicate-font-file or
the other lintian tests that check upstream stuff?
I think they lead to widely-used, persistent overrides, and I think such
Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de writes:
Usually an override is a fail in the maintainer's brain or a bug in
lintian. Only in rare cases overrides are the right way to go.
Yes, that's pretty much my point: that *if* a Lintian check leads to
many maintainers adding an override for that tag that
5 matches
Mail list logo
