Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-14 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2009/11/14 Jakub Wilk : > * Piotr Ożarowski , 2009-11-14, 01:29: >> >> After rebuilding most packages that build depend on >> python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that >> didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as >> well (with "usr-local" user

Re: Bug#556148: installs files into /usr/local for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:21:30PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | I have sent a patch, which should work. I've tested it in my chroot, > | and it does seem to work; others can verify and let you know. > > Two words: You rock! Thanks; just do my best! :-) > The bug repotr only went to -s

Re: Bug#556148: installs files into /usr/local for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 November 2009 at 12:57, Kumar Appaiah wrote: | On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:25:02AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > I am swamped. | > | > I will not be able to get it soon. | > | > You guys have working 'experimental' pbuilders. | > | > Can you help? | > | > as

Re: Bug#556148: installs files into /usr/local for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:25:02AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I am swamped. > > I will not be able to get it soon. > > You guys have working 'experimental' pbuilders. > > Can you help? > > as the original bug report suggested that I may want to ask for help on > d

Re: Bug#556148: installs files into /usr/local for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
(Resending with _corrected_ 7-bit mail headers) On 14 November 2009 at 17:48, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | Starting from Python 2.6, the installation paths for distutils have | > | changed. /usr/local is now used by default. | > | | > | When rebuilt against python-all{,

Re: Bug#556148: installs files into /usr/local for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-14 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Starting from Python 2.6, the installation paths for distutils have > | changed. /usr/local is now used by default. > | > | When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from Debian > | experimental, your package contained these files: > > I don't

Re: Python 2.6 in unstable

2009-11-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2009-11-14, 01:29: After rebuilding most packages that build depend on python-all{,-dev,-dbg}[0], I reported few more bugs. Packages that didn't FTBFS but ship files in /usr/local are now listed on that page as well (with "usr-local" usertag). If someone wants to help with ch