W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
sdist-test and would use it each day.
;-)
How would a putative ‘sdist_test’ differ from ‘test’? Why is this an
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18:25AM +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
sdist-test and would use it each day.
;-)
How
Hi,
[Barry Warsaw]
[Zygmunt Krynicki]
Can please we have standardized hooks to build sphinx documentation and run
setup.py test tests?
I'd like to see the packaging folks address this. Eric is subscribed to this
list and can probably speak to packaging's take on it, but my preferences
Le 15/06/2011 10:18, Zygmunt Krynicki a écrit :
W dniu 15.06.2011 03:28, Ben Finney pisze:
If we are talking from a perspective of upstream developers that
also maintain their packages then I would *love* to see setup.py
sdist-test and would use it each day.
;-)
How would a putative
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
it is fine and it is useful... as a submodule, not as a top-level module
Agreed! I think I get what you're driving at now. Some applications don't
put their Python code or tests in a package. In those cases, yes by all means
a private
Hello,
Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
contains the debugging symbols?
The first variant seems to be more common, but I'm having trouble to
come up with a good pattern for debian/xx.install
Le mercredi 15 juin 2011 à 15:47 -0400, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
contains the debugging symbols?
It should definitely go into python-xx-dbg.
The first
On 06/15/2011 09:47 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Should I put the extension build for the debug interpreter into the
normal python-xx package, or into the python-xx-dbg package that also
contains the debugging symbols?
The first variant seems to be more common, but I'm having trouble to
come up
* Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org, 2011-06-15, 07:31:
On the debian side I always have to copy-paste the same-looking code
over and over again (symlink jquery,
If you use dh_link in your debian/rules (most likely you do), you need
only a single line in debian/packagename.links to do that.
9 matches
Mail list logo