Hi Barry,
thanks for your work!
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote:
Here's the page I mentioned regarding a *proposed* transition plan to using
git for team packages. It's more or less a brain dump right now, and don't
feel like you need to read it before
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Sandro Tosi wrote:
It seems to me like very vocal Git fanatics, who refuse to touch any
package which is not maintained in Git (-.-), are pushing and pushing
to that VCS without any clear advantage.
You might dismiss those people but you're speaking of true
Le 26/08/2014 20:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
* the git-buildpackage workflow is really quite wonderful and reasonably
flexible, I highly recommend it, and I think it will improve the productivity
of this team.
Hello,
At Wikimedia we solely use git-buildpackage. DD Michael Prokop
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Stuart Prescott wrote:
I've done some personal investigation since the BOF, and am preparing
some really simple migration scripts, so we can get a feel for what it
will look like. My scripts so far (very very simple)
Le 27/08/2014 10:13, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
snip
Offline commits? how many time (for real..) you badly needed it? i
guess so few that if you (for one time) just do a big commit instead
of a storm of micro commit the world wont stop
As a side effect, that also mean you don't have to use a
Le 25/08/2014 23:00, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
Here's the page I mentioned regarding a *proposed* transition plan to using
git for team packages. It's more or less a brain dump right now, and don't
feel like you need to read it before the DC14 session.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Sandro Tosi wrote:
It seems to me like very vocal Git fanatics, who refuse to touch any
package which is not maintained in Git (-.-), are pushing and pushing
to that VCS without any
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Antoine Musso has...@free.fr wrote:
Le 27/08/2014 10:13, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
snip
Offline commits? how many time (for real..) you badly needed it? i
guess so few that if you (for one time) just do a big commit instead
of a storm of micro commit the world
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Sandro Tosi wrote:
like true contributors are those using svn right now. and what about
the majority of contributors now? we should change just because maybe,
eventually, if we're lucky we'll attract more contributors? saying I
won't contribute to your team if you don't
On 2014-08-27 at 10:40:40 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Sandro Tosi wrote:
It seems to me like very vocal Git fanatics, who refuse to touch any
package which is not maintained in Git (-.-), are pushing and pushing
to that VCS without any clear advantage.
You might
Hi Sandro,
I rarely need to use log, and I used to work on the svn repo on a 56k
[..]
that you rarely use log is (a) not relevant to the people who would use it
and (b) quite possibly highly influenced by the fact that svn log is so slow
and painful. Remember that the tool can shape the user.
This discussion has been had many times before over many years. Of late, the
and it was never driven by the problems we have, but just by oh look
how cool git is, everybody else is using it, and i'm too lazy to
learn a new tool arguments.
difficulty in switching VCS has been the blocker. I
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
Coupled with a pre review software such as Gerrit, that let one propose
a patchset, have the build result displayed and iterate until the patch
is ready to land in the branch.
I personally love such gated systems when working on software. They
On 2014-08-27 01:41, Antoine Musso wrote:
Le 27/08/2014 10:13, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
snip
Offline commits? how many time (for real..) you badly needed it? i
guess so few that if you (for one time) just do a big commit instead
of a storm of micro commit the world wont stop
As a side effect,
Hi Sandro,
On Aug 27, 2014, at 09:13 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
nothing against your effort or experiments (I really appreciate it),
but I still don't see what is the advantages of moving to Git.
There's moving to git and moving to a dvcs - slightly different, but
related issues. For me, moving to
On 27 August 2014 18:13, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
is there anything else so attractive about git?
I can think of two benefits off the top of my head.
1. Subversion tags don't work for me. I think this is because I have
deleted files since the last tag, I posted a message here,
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au writes:
2. Sometimes I make repeated mistakes when building a package; under
subversion I have to make a new commit for each one before testing.
Why is that? I'm testing my uncommitted changes with
svn-buildpackage --svn-ignore-new
17 matches
Mail list logo
