On 1 September 2014 13:24, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Before commenting on your proposed package split, I'd just like to
> point out that you don't have to feel compelled to add py3 support to
> your python application when there's no tangible benefit to users (as
> opposed to python modules, of cour
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Jeremy Sanders
wrote:
> Hi - I've update Veusz from 1.20.1 to 1.21.1. This change is minor in the
> packaging (updating changelog and removal of an unnecessary patch).
>
> If anyone has time, could you please give me feedback or upload it?
Debdiff looks fine, uplo
On Aug 30, 2014, at 03:00 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>Relatively few at this point, but there is a session here at DebConf14 this
>evening that will be streamed and might be worth following:
>
>
> https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/75/dgit-treat-the-archive-as-a-git-remote/
Darn, I was
Hi - I've update Veusz from 1.20.1 to 1.21.1. This change is minor in
the packaging (updating changelog and removal of an unnecessary patch).
If anyone has time, could you please give me feedback or upload it?
There's further future possibility to add py3 support, but this will
require further
4 matches
Mail list logo