Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

2015-05-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Barry (2015.05.02_04:37:08_+0200) I cloned the enum34.git repo, and then did an apt-get source to grab the orig.tar.gz. Then: There are pristine-tar branches, so you should be able to git-buildpackage -S and get orig tars from them. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1

Re: /usr/bin/python in Python 2 and 3

2015-05-01 Thread Geoffrey Thomas
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Scott Kitterman wrote: I like it and I don't. If /usr/bin/python is ever going to point to a non- python2 version, then I think the solution is something like this. OTOH, it adds system complexity and presumably slows interpreter startup. If the implementation were

Re: /usr/bin/python in Python 2 and 3

2015-05-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 2 May 2015 at 13:39, Geoffrey Thomas geo...@ldpreload.com wrote: On Sat, 18 Apr 2015, Scott Kitterman wrote: I like it and I don't. If /usr/bin/python is ever going to point to a non- python2 version, then I think the solution is something like this. OTOH, it adds system complexity and

Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

2015-05-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Here's where I currently am (a migration of r32486): https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/svn-migration/ I did a quick test of converting one of these repos to git-dpm. I cloned the enum34.git repo, and then did an apt-get source to

Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

2015-05-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 01, 2015 10:37:08 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Here's where I currently am (a migration of r32486): https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/svn-migration/ I did a quick test of converting one of these repos to git-dpm. I

Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

2015-05-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 01, 2015, at 06:30 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: The big difference would be SVN history. That's the interesting part of my import. I wonder if there are opportunities to combine the two approaches? Also, what about patch regime? The above sets up git-dpm early on, including tag names,

Re: Sample DPMT SVN-GIT migration

2015-05-01 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On 1 May 2015 at 16:46, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: Also, I just saw that git-buildpackage(1) has gone away. It seem like all we have now is gbp(1) but that has a different cli, and I think it has pq built-in. `gbp buildpackage` and `git-buildpackage` have identical options and

Re: Attempting to remove python-support?

2015-05-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 01, 2015 01:28:43 PM Luca Falavigna wrote: 2015-04-26 18:26 GMT+02:00 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org: Would it be better to start filing a MBF against the affected packages Is there consensus about this MBF? I'd like to work on it on the coming days, so please express