Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#849652: faker: FTBFS on 32-bit: ValueError: timestamp out of range for platform time_t

2017-01-30 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 20:31:06 +1100, Brian May wrote: > > File "faker/providers/date_time/__init__.py", line 403, in > > date_time_this_century > > return cls.date_time_between_dates(now, next_century_start, tzinfo) > > File "faker/providers/date_time/__init__.py", line 381, in > >

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#849652: faker: FTBFS on 32-bit: ValueError: timestamp out of range for platform time_t

2017-01-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Brian May wrote: > Help in fixing this RC bug would be appreciated. I have forwarded this > upstream, however need a quick fix for the Debian package (not sure but > suspect it might be too late for stretch). > > Unfortunately, not sure where to start. I don't understand this

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#849652: faker: FTBFS on 32-bit: ValueError: timestamp out of range for platform time_t

2017-01-30 Thread Brian May
To: debian-python mailing list Help in fixing this RC bug would be appreciated. I have forwarded this upstream, however need a quick fix for the Debian package (not sure but suspect it might be too late for stretch). Unfortunately, not sure where to start. I don't understand this

Re: egg-info and Debian-specific submodule packages

2017-01-30 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Luke W Faraone, 2017-01-30] > In bug #744741[1], we have a report where a lack of ``egg-info`` metadata > breaks > both ``pip``'s installation detection and packages that use ``pkg_resources`` > to > discover dependencies. > > Usually, the answer would be simple: ship the ``egg-info`` metadata

Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker

2017-01-30 Thread Brian May
Scott Kitterman writes: > OK. Where do I find documentation to give this a try? I used the following documentation: http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.patches.html -- Brian May