Re: git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-06 Thread Brian May
On 2017-09-07 14:54, Scott Kitterman wrote: > It's a wiki. The resolution of your annoyance is within your grasp. I had already fixed it. Sorry if I didn't make this clear.

Re: git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, September 07, 2017 09:28:11 AM Brian May wrote: > On 2017-09-07 08:42, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Conveniently, we already decided to switch: > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ > > It was annoying me that these instructions were missing the last steps > on how to

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Diane Trout
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 06:20 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Diane, > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:45:14PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > > > > but the build failed (for other reasons).  I'd willing to work on > > > this > > > but I definitely need help since I'm lacking the needed Python > > >

Request to join DPMT

2017-09-06 Thread James Valleroy
Hello, I would like to join the Debian Python Modules Team. I am working on a package for django-axes and would like it to maintain it within the team. My Alioth login is jvalleroy-guest. I have read https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and accept it. -- James signature.asc

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Diane, On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:45:14PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > > but the build failed (for other reasons).  I'd willing to work on > > this > > but I definitely need help since I'm lacking the needed Python > > knowledge. > > Hi, > > I saw your debian-python3 branch for

Re: git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-06 Thread Brian May
On 2017-09-07 08:42, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Conveniently, we already decided to switch: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ It was annoying me that these instructions were missing the last steps on how to switch the default branch to debian/master and delete the old branch.

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Diane Trout
> but the build failed (for other reasons).  I'd willing to work on > this > but I definitely need help since I'm lacking the needed Python > knowledge. Hi, I saw your debian-python3 branch for statsmodels. The dependencies added in the package should probably be added as build-dependencies.

git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-06 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: >> But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using >> git-buildpackage? > > Yes. Ok, that's reassuring. I'll have a look at the packaging, since I'm already on alioth. But since DPMT is CC-ed (I normally follow via gmane), I take the occasion

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Great. What about sending a patch with your changes to the bug > report? I've added a branch debian-python3 to I always built from source, not with the debian packaging. >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/statsmodels.git > >

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yuri, On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:35:57PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I always built from source, not with the debian packaging. > > >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/statsmodels.git > > > > but the build failed (for other reasons). I'd willing to work on this > >

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:26:13PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I opened an issue on Github > > > > https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/3909 > > > > requesting Python3 support. > > I concur with what was said in the issue. > This

Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic

2017-09-06 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:45:31 +0200): > Mathias Behrle wrote... > > > So finally I am still quite undetermined what to do to get the actual > > release of relatorio packaged[5] (it will be needed for the next release of > > Tryton). For

Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic

2017-09-06 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:24:25 +0200): > Mathias Behrle wrote... > > > * Christoph Biedl: " Re: Namespace conflict for python-magic" (Mon, 4 Sep > > 2017 19:38:56 +0200): > > > > The cleanest solution indeed was to bring both