How to properly use dh_python3 as lintian suggests to move files from usr/lib/python3.7 to usr/lib/python3

2018-08-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, for the new version of python-pyvcf[1] I get W: python3-pyvcf: python-module-in-wrong-location usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/vcf/ usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/vcf/ W: python3-pyvcf: python-module-in-wrong-location usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/vcf/parser.py

RE:Is there a tool to debianize for the first time a package from pypi

2018-08-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
no problem Ghislain, I am on it :)) Cheers Fred

Re: Is there a tool to debianize for the first time a package from pypi

2018-08-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/pypi2deb On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:45 AM PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Hello, I need to create a new package for > > spyder_kernels. > > Is there a tool which allows to create the first version of a package which > create the debian/directory from the

Re: Is there a tool to debianize for the first time a package from pypi

2018-08-03 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Fred, You can probably use one of the packaging for one of the Spyder plugins as the basis for src:spyder-kernels. Otherwise, I can do it if you prefer? Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 14:45, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel < frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> a écrit : > Hello, I need to create

Is there a tool to debianize for the first time a package from pypi

2018-08-03 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I need to create a new package for spyder_kernels. Is there a tool which allows to create the first version of a package which create the debian/directory from the setup.py files ? thanks Frederic

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)

2018-08-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
> 1. convert git-dpm -> gbp thanks for doing this! > 2. change default branch to debian/master please dont. a quick check to the perl team and it seems they dont require it, so should we? if someone wants to follow DEP-14 then just do so and document it on debian/README.source (and repoint

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)

2018-08-03 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2018-08-03 10:08, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2018-08-03 08:04, Simon McVittie wrote: > > There is no upstream/master, upstream/unstable, upstream/stretch or > > similar in DEP-14, because: > > I did not suggest mingling upstream branches with Debian > versions, which seems to be your

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)

2018-08-03 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2018-08-03 08:04, Simon McVittie wrote: > There is no upstream/master, upstream/unstable, upstream/stretch or > similar in DEP-14, because: I did not suggest mingling upstream branches with Debian versions, which seems to be your impression. I just (maybe wrongly) thought, that upstream/master

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)

2018-08-03 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 at 08:21:28 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > In fact, I thought that "upstream/master" were DEP-14-ish, but > only "upstream/latest" (for the newest release) is. Yes. The simple case for DEP-14 is that you are only following one upstream branch, which is upstream/latest; the

Re: git-dpm -> gbp conversion (mass-change)

2018-08-03 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2018-08-03 04:33, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On August 3, 2018 3:51:00 AM UTC, "W. Martin Borgert" > wrote: > >How about changing "upstream" to "upstream/latest" (for upstream > >releases, typically for unstable) and "upstream/master" (for > >following upstream master, typically for